On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:05 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 22 May 2021 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT), "je...@lisp.sh" wrote:
> To keep the build process from getting too big while still improving
> cross-build support, we might add more Minimal Racket builds without
> expanding the set of full distrib
At Wed, 26 May 2021 14:09:57 +0200, "Jesse Alama" wrote:
> On Sun, May 23, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> > At Sat, 22 May 2021 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT), "je...@lisp.sh" wrote:
> > > Is there any interest in having a FreeBSD installation alongside the
> > > macOS, Windows, and Linux?
> >
On Sun, May 23, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 22 May 2021 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT), "je...@lisp.sh" wrote:
> > Is there any interest in having a FreeBSD installation alongside the
> > macOS, Windows, and Linux?
>
> I'm not sure how ready the John (the release manager) will be to ad
Well, I’m not over the moon about another release platform; is there
significant demand? I know, I know, the meaning of the word “significant” is
completely unspecified. I would certainly agree with Matthew that the Minimal
installations might be a less painful addition.
It may be unclear why a
At Sat, 22 May 2021 08:09:53 -0700 (PDT), "je...@lisp.sh" wrote:
> Is there any interest in having a FreeBSD installation alongside the
> macOS, Windows, and Linux?
I'm not sure how ready the John (the release manager) will be to add a
new platform, but I'm willing to give it a try at the Utah sna
Is there any interest in having a FreeBSD installation alongside the macOS,
Windows, and Linux?
Background: I'd like to use raco cross to cross-compile native binaries,
working on x86_64 Linux and targeting x86_64 FreeBSD (ta6fb). While
naively trying out raco cross, I noticed that it (tries t
