Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Just to update, the default (-j4) build is still failing on ppc64el / > aarm64 with racket 6.3 > > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=racket=ppc64el=6.3-2 > amp=1450447398 > > I can try a single threaded build

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:04:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: > > > On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: > >>At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > >>> > >>> I can try a single threaded build later,

[racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

On 19/12/15 00:04, David Bremner wrote: Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: I can try a single threaded build later, but I wondered if the huge number of

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado writes: > On Friday 18 December 2015 13:42:32 Matthew Flatt wrote: >>At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >>> >>> I can try a single threaded build later, but I wondered if the huge >>> number of warnings from the JIT code

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:21:29 -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> Just to update, the default (-j4) build is still failing on ppc64el / >> aarm64 with racket 6.3 >> >> >> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=racket=ppc64el=6.3-2 >>

[racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Apparently, racket's threads have problems on linux/ppc64. I ran manually each test and only failed thread.rktl. Here is the output: http://git.io/vqm18 quiet.rktl contains this code: ;; -- set up a timeout (set! timeout-thread (thread (lambda () (sleep 1200)

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

It's possible that the recent change will fix this problem, but I'm not optimistic. Assuming that the test still fails, is it possible to get output from `racket -f basic.rktl` to we can see more specifically the point of failure? At Fri, 3 Jul 2015 01:11:59 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Thanks for your help! I now have a build that works on my Qemu installation. The problem was that the signal-handling stack installed via sigaltstack() was too small. Making the stack 10*SIGSTKSZ bytes instead of SIGSTKSZ bytes solves the problem. In retrospect, it's clear how this is related to

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu writes: I was able to get an AArch64 installation running with Qemu, and I think I've found the main problem with these failing builds. The end of gc2.h has a preprocessor test for `__x86_64__` or `WIN64`, but it should have been a more general test for

[racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

Racket builds fine on linux/ppc64 with your change. The tests fail: $ racket -f quiet.rktl Section(basic) TIMEOUT -- ABORTING! On 07/03/2015 12:31 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: I was able to get an AArch64 installation running with Qemu, and I think I've found the main problem with these failing

Re: [racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:44:46AM +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: Similar bug: http://bugs.racket-lang.org/query/?cmd=view%20audit-traildatabase=defaultpr=15079 David, Debian has some machine with those architectures available to give shell accounts to upstream developers?. I

[racket-dev] Re: support for arm64 / aarch64

On 06/29/2015 09:31 AM, David Bremner wrote: Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu writes: It looks like this patch was submitted for v6.1. Version 6.1.1 (the current release), uses SGC instead of Boehm's GC during the build process by default. So, it at least avoids this immediate problem. I