Matthias Felleisen writes:
A web site is an ad.
As is a research paper. It's the audience that differs.
I am sorry but you embrace modern CS departments too much,
and there is push-back coming about. Don't bother me with
papers that I can't reconstruct and accept after that
Was this a reference to a particular racket lib? And if so, which one?
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/577878167542734848
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
Brian Craft wrote on 03/27/2015 03:45 PM:
Was this a reference to a particular racket lib? And if so, which one?
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/577878167542734848
The `read` and `write` procedures are one way to do this. (Though you
want to disable some features when you do that.
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 2:45:00 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote:
Was this a reference to a particular racket lib? And if so, which one?
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/577878167542734848
I have a long history of bit packing multiplayer network messages, but for this
project I am
It might be interesting to create a binary s-expression format for more
efficient reading/writing, a la BSON’s relationship to JSON. Perhaps even with
some sort of optional compression. Racket’s reader is fairly complicated,
though, so it might need to restrict itself to a useful subset?
On
I want to be able to build simple (windows) utilities for other team members
that don't have Racket installed. The archive-with-dlls option is better than
nothing, but it would be a whole lot better to have a single statically linked
exe. In this case, it is a 13 MB executable, and only 5 MB
Couldn't this binary s-expression just be a struct?
'(move 3 5)
becomes
(struct move (x y) #:prefab)
(move 3 5)
client/server will likely have some kind of matching either way, and prefab
structs can be matched
(match command
[(list 'move x y) ...
becomes
(match command
[(move x y) ...
Look at my original response to John's post about this... The binary format
you are thinking of is racket/fasl.
Jay
On Friday, March 27, 2015, Sean Kanaley skana...@gmail.com wrote:
Couldn't this binary s-expression just be a struct?
'(move 3 5)
becomes
(struct move (x y) #:prefab)
Oh, very neat... racket/fasl was precisely the sort of thing I was thinking of.
On Mar 27, 2015, at 17:26, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at my original response to John's post about this... The binary format
you are thinking of is racket/fasl.
Jay
On Friday, March
Just comenting only on Alexis's suggestion here, since sounds like John
is happy with sexps for now.
I don't see how `racket/fasl` is suitable for heterogeneous interop,
which is a very common case needing this, perhaps the most common.
Spec-wise, `racket/fasl` is not defined, beyond that it
Hmm, yes, on closer inspection, I see that you’re right. It’s not worthless,
but it’s definitely not ideal for actually using as a communication protocol.
So I guess my original point still stands: having a consistent binary encoding
for s-expressions could be nice.
On Mar 27, 2015, at 18:10,
At Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:42:03 -0700 (PDT), John Carmack wrote:
I want to be able to build simple (windows) utilities for other team
members that don't have Racket installed. The archive-with-dlls
option is better than nothing, but it would be a whole lot better to
have a single statically
Matthias Felleisen writes:
A web site is an ad.
As is a research paper. It's the audience that differs.
I am sorry but you embrace modern CS departments too much,
and there is push-back coming about. Don't bother me with
papers that I can't reconstruct and accept after that
On Mar 27, 2015, at 4:11 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
Matthias Felleisen writes:
A web site is an ad.
As is a research paper. It's the audience that differs.
I am sorry but you embrace modern CS departments too much,
and there is push-back coming about. Don't bother me with
papers that
I tried already to change the line but what i want to see is when i write '(1 2
3) in the REPL i want to get (1 2 3) and not '(1 2 3) or (mcons 1( mcons 2...
Just like DrRacket in r5rs language do!
Any idea what to do?
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Mar 2015, at 00:44, Alexander D. Knauth
Does changing it do this do what you want?
(make-evaluator '(special r5rs) '(require r5rs/init)
On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Chrakhan chrakhan.barza...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried already to change the line but what i want to see is when i write '(1
2 3) in the REPL i want to get (1 2 3) and not
On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Alexander D. Knauth alexan...@knauth.org wrote:
Does changing it do this do what you want?
(make-evaluator '(special r5rs) '(require r5rs/init)
And I forgot, also add a [current-print write] to the parameterize form?
On Mar 27, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Chrakhan
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 2:45:00 PM UTC-5, Brian Craft wrote:
Was this a reference to a particular racket lib? And if so, which one?
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/577878167542734848
I have a long history of bit packing multiplayer network messages, but for this
project I am
I want to be able to build simple (windows) utilities for other team members
that don't have Racket installed. The archive-with-dlls option is better than
nothing, but it would be a whole lot better to have a single statically linked
exe. In this case, it is a 13 MB executable, and only 5 MB
Does this changing this line to `(make-evaluator ‘(special r5rs)` do what you
want?
https://github.com/jarcane/try-racket/blob/master/main.rkt#L53
On Mar 27, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Chrakhan Barzanji chrakhan.barza...@gmail.com
wrote:
hi,
as you may know in TryRacket the language of the REPL is
Oh, very neat... racket/fasl was precisely the sort of thing I was thinking of.
On Mar 27, 2015, at 17:26, Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com wrote:
Look at my original response to John's post about this... The binary format
you are thinking of is racket/fasl.
Jay
On Friday, March
21 matches
Mail list logo
