Alexander D. Knauth alexan...@knauth.org writes:
For tables, I wrote my own version of some kind of table for racket’s gui
so that I could use it in a gui latin dictionary I was making.
Thanks. Looks good.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every endeavor
Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu writes:
I have written GUI applications in Racket, .NET, Swing and tk, and
Racket is the most pleasant by far, IMO.
I'm glad to hear it. Racket, as language, really looks beautiful - simple
syntax and powerful expressibility, afaict.
Do you find Racket's
Alexander D. Knauth alexan...@knauth.org writes:
Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
dummy panel and then reparenting them seem like they could be bad ideas.
https://github.com/AlexKnauth/racket-gui-table
Thank you. I did star it.
What about trees? You
The following puzzles me:
#lang racket
(define plus +)
(free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus) ; - #f
#lang racket
(define-syntax (a stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((_) (datum-syntax stx (free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus)
(define plus +)
(a) ; - #f
#lang racket
(define plus +)
(define-syntax (a stx)
Notice that not only does the output file fail to open, but also the raco
pkg show has a similar error. I missed that the first read through.
I see you said you installed manually main-distribution. You could look
into that process. I think you should verify no issues exist before you do
that
I don't know how other people feel about someone else putting packages
they wrote into the new package system, but I think it's a problem.
Today marks at least the third time that I was about to move forward
with the new package system, but it just came to a screeching halt, when
I found
Lux wrote on 04/03/2015 05:47 AM:
cgi.assign = ( .rkt = /usr/bin/racket )
scgi.server = ( .rkt = ((
bin-path = /usr/bin/racket,
socket = /tmp/racket.socket
)))
scgi.debug = 1
--
Trying to
Tree?
Do you mean this?
http://docs.racket-lang.org/mrlib/Hierarchical_List_Control.html?q=button%25
/Jens Axel
2015-04-04 10:30 GMT+02:00 Gour g...@atmarama.net:
Alexander D. Knauth alexan...@knauth.org writes:
Here it is, although some of the things I did like creating objects on a
On Apr 4, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Jos Koot jos.k...@gmail.com wrote:
The following puzzles me:
#lang racket
(define plus +)
(free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus) ; - #f
#lang racket
(define-syntax (a stx)
(syntax-case stx ()
((_) (datum-syntax stx (free-identifier=? #'+ #'plus)
(define
Is there a way to define a syntax-class so that for example in:
(syntax-parse stx
[(_ a:stxcls) ….])
It would be able to know that it was used with a, instead of for instance b in
b:stxcls?
Is that possible?
If not, would it be a good idea to add?
The reason I ask is that then it might be
On Saturday, April 4, 2015 at 5:10:21 PM UTC+2, Andrew Mauer-Oats wrote:
Notice that not only does the output file fail to open, but also the raco pkg
show has a similar error. I missed that the first read through.
I see you said you installed manually main-distribution. You could look
Could someone explain how this example works?
$ racket
Welcome to Racket v6.1.1.
- (require racket/sandbox)
- (define racket-eval (make-evaluator 'racket))
- (define a (racket-eval '(set 1 2 3)))
- a
(set 1 2 3)
- (set? a)
#f
- (define racket-eval-again (make-evaluator 'racket))
- (equal? a
On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Erik Silkensen eriksilken...@gmail.com wrote:
Could someone explain how this example works?
$ racket
Welcome to Racket v6.1.1.
- (require racket/sandbox)
- (define racket-eval (make-evaluator 'racket))
- (define a (racket-eval '(set 1 2 3)))
- a
(set 1 2 3)
13 matches
Mail list logo