On Sunday, April 26, 2015 at 6:18:41 AM UTC-7, Alex Knauth wrote:
Wow this is awesome!
Can you get to support rackunit too?
Thanks Alex. Which rackunit test variants would you prioritize?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users group.
To
On Apr 26, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
On Apr 26, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Apr 26, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
I wanted to see if it could work for tests within (module+ test …), and it
does (even though
On Apr 26, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Matthias Felleisen matth...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
On Apr 26, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Alexander D. Knauth wrote:
I wanted to see if it could work for tests within (module+ test …), and it
does (even though check-expect doesn’t, which is weird for check-expect but
Well probably check-equal?, check-match, check-pred, check, and check-exn would
be the main ones, with check-equal? probably being the most important, but what
would be really cool would be something that could generalize over all rackunit
checks, so that even checks defined with define-check,
4 matches
Mail list logo
