Yes, more or less. In an X-expression, an attribute list is the only element
that's a list made of sublists. A list of embedded X-expressions, OTOH, will
start with a symbol. To look at it another way,
> (cons symbol (list xexpr ...))
really amounts to
> (list symbol xexpr ...)
which is just
Very nice. Thank you Jay. That will be a big help.
On Jul 28, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Jay McCarthy wrote:
> I'm a little later than I expected, but I just added the ability to
> use regexps in test-omit-paths and in a new info.rkt property called
> test-include-paths. The test case [1] shows an exam
Greg Hendershott wrote on 07/28/2015 04:30 PM:
Imagine conversion functions `xexpr->sxml` and `sxml->xexpr`.
Would implementing them be any easier than unifying xexprs and sxml
(or is it really just the same problem)?
Yes, I think those procedures would be easy to implement in such a way
that
Maybe a dumb question, but:
Imagine conversion functions `xexpr->sxml` and `sxml->xexpr`.
Would implementing them be any easier than unifying xexprs and sxml
(or is it really just the same problem)?
If it turns out there isn't any ideal implementation, is there at
least some pragmatic implementa
I'm a little later than I expected, but I just added the ability to
use regexps in test-omit-paths and in a new info.rkt property called
test-include-paths. The test case [1] shows an example where all files
matching #rx".*include.*" are included, such as the file
`b-include-1.racket-file`. This sh
As Jay indicated, I believe in eating some of my dog food so I do use DrRacket
for writing Racket programs. But yes, as he also said I tuned DrRacket to fit
my taste a bit and it works reasonably well for maintaining my friends in the
htdp package. And I will admit that on rare occasions I temp
I believe the page is mostly up to date.
But just in case, you may want to skim pkgs.racket-lang.org before
diving in to a particular project, to see if someone already implemented
something similar.
Vincent
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 02:56:06 -0500,
Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What
Oops, I meant to mention Kirill Lisovsky as an early developer of neat
SXML tools, too.
Neil Van Dyke wrote on 07/28/2015 10:51 AM:
In short, it's a historical accident, but the confusion seems less
costly than a compromise would, IMHO.
Details...
15 years ago, the famous Oleg Kiselyov defin
In short, it's a historical accident, but the confusion seems less
costly than a compromise would, IMHO.
Details...
15 years ago, the famous Oleg Kiselyov defined SXML:
http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/xml.html
Scheme people in general saw that SXML was good. Perhaps more a
motivation, we saw t
Is Neil's xexp format different that the one being used in racket due to
the
attribute list beginning with an '@'?
(write-html '((html (head (title "My Title")) (body (@ (bgcolor
"white")) (h1 "My Heading") (p "This is a
paragraph.") (p "This is an
2015-07-28 1:48 GMT+03:00 John Carmack :
> Any chance that could make it in as a DrRacket feature?
Btw, this question is a valuable reason why I love Lisp and Emacs -- it's
possible to
implement almost any desired feature on one's own without waiting from
vendor ;)
--
// Dmitry.
--
You receiv
Hi All,
What is the current status of the "intro projects" wiki page at (
https://github.com/plt/racket/wiki/Intro-Projects)? Is it kept current? I'm
looking for ways to contribute to the community, and to better get my feet
wet. I have a few random project ideas that, while interesting to me, are
12 matches
Mail list logo
