The scripts are slightly different. Is it necessary or it' enough to
change the version and md5?
Gustavo
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> I dumped onto the Web the files I used to build OpenWrt packages for Racket:
>
Gustavo Massaccesi wrote on 02/13/2016 10:20 AM:
The scripts are slightly different. Is it necessary or it' enough to
change the version and md5?
For Racket 6.4, I would copy the makefile for 6.2 pre-release
(`Makefile-6.1.91.900`), rename it `Makefile`, change the version and
MD5 in the
Hello,
almost year ago I've become interested in Racket, but due to several
reasons it did fall by the wayside. :-(
Recently I decided to migrate most of my tool-chain to Emacs (editor,
org-mode, Gnus...) and then, naturally, when considering about learning
some Elisp, I've remembered my past
Saša Janiška wrote on 02/13/2016 12:31 PM:
So, at the end I just wonder how is it that such Wonderland is not
discovered by much more people?
Being non-mainstream for practitioners, Racket is most popular with
people who have the freedom to choose any tools they want, not forced
into a
I want to make a test with a chaperone of an immutable hash, but the
signature of make-chaperone-hash has too many parts.
Do anyone have an example of use of make-chaperone-hash. If possible,
the chaperone that does nothing, only forward the values.
Gustavo
--
You received this message because
I think this is what you want?
(chaperone-hash
(hash)
(λ (h key) (values key (λ (h key val) val)))
(λ (h key val) (values key val))
(λ (h key) key)
(λ (h key) key)
(λ (hash) 'okay)
(λ (hash key) key))
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Gustavo Massaccesi wrote:
> I
I added similar basic tests here.
https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/master/pkgs/racket-test-core/tests/racket/hash.rktl
On Feb 13, 2016 4:12 PM, "Robby Findler"
wrote:
> I think this is what you want?
>
> (chaperone-hash
> (hash)
> (λ (h key) (values key (λ (h
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Nota Poin wrote:
>
> at-exp really is a fascinating language,
It's not a language in itself, it's a meta-language, which modifies the
actual language with the @-form syntax.
> but if a (flatten) isn't any more computationally expensive, you
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:01 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
> I’m running a fairly vanilla pre-pyret PLAI class, using the
> plai-typed language. Has anyone looked into doing this using Typed
> Racket?
*cough* A long, long time ago, and still going.
9 matches
Mail list logo