Re: [racket-users] Appropriate open source license for a Racket based framework

Brian Adkins wrote on 03/01/2016 11:31 PM: Are there any particular license issues that I should be aware of in this regard? I don't know. Looks like core Racket is now LGPLv3, which is pretty flexible about commercial uses. I've been using LGPLv3 for almost all of my Racket packages

[racket-users] Appropriate open source license for a Racket based framework

I've finally begun a project to create a web framework for Racket. Are there any particular license issues that I should be aware of in this regard? The MIT License is used by both Rails and Phoenix, and I've used it for other side projects, so I'm inclined to use it for this new framework

Re: [racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow

Something is wrong with your installation. 6.4 is in the same ball park as 6.1 Can you share the code that runs 20x slower? Thanks — Matthias > On Mar 1, 2016, at 10:51 PM, vkelmenson via Racket Users > wrote: > > I recently downloaded Racket version 6.4. I

[racket-users] Racket 6.4 very slow

I recently downloaded Racket version 6.4. I have previously been using version 6.1. It is much slower than version 6.1. Several short functions run approx 20 times slower on 6.4 than 6.1. These were run at the same time on the sam matine in succession. I am using Mac osX version 10.8.5 Has

Re: [racket-users] farewell, sweet PLaneT

Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote on 03/01/2016 06:32 PM: One package that I noticed you didn't move was 'htmlprag', which your web page says is obsolete. I mention this only because some packages on the pkg server (such as gut and wrap) still use this library. How trivial is it to port to the new code,

Re: [racket-users] farewell, sweet PLaneT

This is great, I've now been able to submit several pull requests to use your new packages. One package that I noticed you didn't move was 'htmlprag', which your web page says is obsolete. I mention this only because some packages on the pkg server (such as gut and wrap) still use this library.

Re: [racket-users] Typo in license.html.

I just pushed a fix. Thanks for the report! Vincent On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 05:26:44 -0600, Dmitry Igrishin wrote: > > Hello, > > I've noticed a typo at https://download.racket-lang.org/license.html > - a double "for for" here: > > "We have chosen the LGPL as the license for Racket, which makes

Re: [racket-users] Web server tcp-read: error reading (errno=104), connection reset by peer

Good, I'll now ignore it in peace then. Thanks, Marc On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: > I'm pretty sure this is in the "stuff happens, move on" category. The > error happens when a client abandons a connection, for example, and you > should expect all

[racket-users] Re: Web server tcp-read: error reading (errno=104), connection reset by peer

On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:45:03 -0500, Marc Kaufmann wrote: >I am running a live server now, rather than local, and it keeps logging >this error message: > >tcp-read: error reading > system error: Connection reset by peer; errno=104 > >I have no idea what this means other

Re: [racket-users] Web server tcp-read: error reading (errno=104), connection reset by peer

I'm pretty sure this is in the "stuff happens, move on" category. The error happens when a client abandons a connection, for example, and you should expect all sorts of communication interruptions. At Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:45:03 -0500, Marc Kaufmann wrote: > Hi, > > I am running a live server now,

[racket-users] Web server tcp-read: error reading (errno=104), connection reset by peer

Hi, I am running a live server now, rather than local, and it keeps logging this error message: tcp-read: error reading system error: Connection reset by peer; errno=104 I have no idea what this means other than finding out on StackOverflow that the error means someone somewhere has shut the

[racket-users] [TFP 2016] 2nd call for papers

- C A L L F O R P A P E R S - TFP 2016 === 17th Symposium on Trends in Functional Programming June