Both techniques worked for me! Thanks!
I’m not sure why (format-id #’n “foo~a” [syntax-e #’n)) works when (format-id
six “foo~a” (syntax-e #’n)) does not though. Apparently I need to look into the
differences between the two contexts.
-Kevin
> On May 20, 2016, at 2:58 PM, Sam Caldwell
Kevin,
I have made this exact mistake in the past. The trouble is with the
lexical context being passed to `format-id`.
(_foo 3)
foo3
;; 3
Here, _foo is passed the syntax #'(_foo 3), which came from the same
environment as the reference, foo3.
(foo 3)
foo3
;; error ...
Here, _foo is passed
The macro application (foo 3) expands into
#'(begin
(_foo n0)
(foo n ...))
The expansion of (_foo n0) then defines foo3, but
the scope will only include the piece of code above.
To make definitions made by sub-macros available
Hi guys,
I’ve been interested in having a macro build a series of defines. So I decided
to start small, trying to get to a macro that would do something like the
following to begin with:
>(foo 3)
(define foo1 1)
(define foo2 2)
(define foo3 3)
I start with a macro that appears to do a single
I's like to try mixing texts written in scribble with those written in
another notation. I have a program that transltes files in the other
notation to HTML (or to open document format, for that matter).
It there an easy way to invoke it during scribble processing and use it
to convert the
I seem to be facing a different issue though it fits into the same topic; i.e.
the example mentioned in the docs does not work for me.
Anyway when I try to run the example, I get the following output:
$ racket -l mode-lambda/examples/one
You can press these keys:
r - show random
6 matches
Mail list logo
