Re: [racket-users] Path inside package?

Thank you! That works great! Now I'll try updating my package for racket, hope it works there to. I made a pmap package for racket that can be downloaded in the manager, I've mad map with futures before and now I got a working version with places to. -- You received this message because you

Re: [racket-users] Path inside package?

Right, the use of `define-runtime-path` needs to be a the top-level of the module. You can't put it inside of a function, but you don't need to. Sam On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Andreas Olsson wrote: > It says it needs to be "top level"? > > -- > You received this

Re: [racket-users] Path inside package?

It says it needs to be "top level"? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: [racket-users] Path inside package?

You should use `define-runtime-path` as follows: (define-runtime-path worker "place-worker.rkt") ... (dynamic-place worker 'place-main) ... Sam On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Andreas Olsson wrote: > Lock the example in

Re: [racket-users] Path inside package?

> On Jan 9, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Andreas Olsson wrote: > > > I'm having a little trouble. I have constructed a package with files that > work when tested in a directory, when installed as a package I get a path > problem. A function in one file creates places that's

[racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Does anybody have an implementation of the Mann-Whitney U test (or the equivalent Wilcoxson Rank test) in Racket? I imagine I could easily hack up my own, but somebody else may have done a better job of it already. --Mitch -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[racket-users] Path inside package?

I'm having a little trouble. I have constructed a package with files that work when tested in a directory, when installed as a package I get a path problem. A function in one file creates places that's loaded with a separate file, the path to the file has proven hard to create. I've tryed

[racket-users] Stack traces for phase 1 errors?

I have run into a few situations lately where I would really appreciate stack traces for errors in my compile-time code. However, I can’t figure out how to get errortrace to work with errors that occur at compile-time. For example, here’s a simple program: #lang racket (begin-for-syntax

Re: [racket-users] How do I offer suggestions for the docs?

Many thanks, Royall. That was frustrating me a lot. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:27 PM, 'Royall Spence' via Racket Users wrote: > I think this is what you're looking for: >

Re: [racket-users] How do I offer suggestions for the docs?

I think this is what you're looking for: https://github.com/racket/racket/blob/62f5b2c4e4cdefa18fa36275074ff9fe376ddaf3/pkgs/racket-doc/scribblings/reference/data.scrbl I was only able to find it by searching a string in the racket/racket repo on github.com. As far as I know, you just submit a

[racket-users] How do I offer suggestions for the docs?

Sometimes I find places in the docs where things could be better -- for example, I think it would make sense if the Keywords page (http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/keywords.html?q=string-%3Edocs#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._string-~3ekeyword%29%29) had a mention of keyword-apply, and

Re: [racket-users] Re: Dynamically generated keywords -- are they possible?

Good to know. Thanks, Jack. On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Jack Firth wrote: > On Monday, January 9, 2017 at 9:47:03 AM UTC-8, David K. Storrs wrote: >> What should string->keyword be used for? I was expecting this to work >> but it does not: >> >> (define (foo #:x x) (+

Re: [racket-users] Dynamically generated keywords -- are they possible?

You can use it with keyword-apply (define (foo #:x x) (+ x 3)) (keyword-apply foo (list (string->keyword "x")) (list 8) '()) ;; ==> 11 http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/procedures.html#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fbase..rkt%29._keyword-apply%29%29 On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 12:47 PM,

[racket-users] Dynamically generated keywords -- are they possible?

What should string->keyword be used for? I was expecting this to work but it does not: (define (foo #:x x) (+ x 3)) (foo (string->keyword "x") 8) ; foo: arity mismatch; ; the expected number of arguments does not match the given number ; expected: 0 plus an argument with keyword #:x ;

Re: [racket-users] Re: FFI Library Naming Conventions

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:56:06AM -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > * (One argument *against* using Racket idiomatic names for a big API, such > as OpenGL, is that sometimes you might really want to make the names look > like the C ones, such as for people copying large masses of example code. > I'm

Re: [racket-users] Re: FFI Library Naming Conventions

* Remember that, although Racket is rich with various kinds of namespaces, documentation lookup for the core Racket and add-on packages really prefer that names are mostly unique globally. (I won't get into readability tradeoffs, for various use cases that come up.) See thread