Re: [racket-users] Thread and filesystem watching

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:52 PM, David Storrs > wrote: > >> [snip] >> >> - When I create the 'monitor this' event, I will need to wrap the sync in >>> a thread since (sync) is

Re: [racket-users] Stickers!

Thanks Ben, these look great! On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ben Greenman wrote: > Hi Racket Users, > > I ordered a bunch of Racket stickers to celebrate the 6.8 release. Here's > proof: > http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/types/resources/stickers.jpg > > If you send me

Re: [racket-users] Thread and filesystem watching

Hi David, On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:52 PM, David Storrs wrote: > [snip] > > - When I create the 'monitor this' event, I will need to wrap the sync in >> a thread since (sync) is synchronous. > > > > If I understand you correctly, you're considering creating a separate

[racket-users] Re: Stickers!

Stickers? For free?? Count me in! How would you like me to contact you in private? On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 1:15:59 PM UTC-8, Ben Greenman wrote: > > If you send me your address, I will mail you some stickers. For free!* > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[racket-users] Thread and filesystem watching

I mentioned before that I'm writing a system to watch the filesystem for changes. I'm finishing that up and I have a few questions about concurrency issues. 1) How do I determine what a safe maximum number of threads is? 2) I think that (fold-files) is the best way to walk a directory tree,

Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Yo! This conversation has gone seriously off-topic. Can y'all carry it on with some other subject line? --Mitch On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Tim Chase wrote: > Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org. > > You communicate with R processes via JSON.

[racket-users] Stickers!

Hi Racket Users, I ordered a bunch of Racket stickers to celebrate the 6.8 release. Here's proof: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/types/resources/stickers.jpg If you send me your address, I will mail you some stickers. For free!* I'm thinking 4 stickers per request (2 rectangles, 2 circles), but if

[racket-users] Racket v6.8

Racket version 6.8 is now available from http://racket-lang.org/ - Racket sports a new logo, courtesy of Matthew Butterick. - MacBook Pro laptops with touch bars are supported. - Support for FreeBSD on PowerPC. - Initial support for GTK3 on Wayland is available. GL contexts, GC blits,

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket: Interactive choice of what submodules to run when clicking Run

I have a keybinding (or rather, a script menu item) that inserts the following into the interaction window: (require (only-in racket/enter dynamic-enter!) (only-in syntax/location quote-module-path)) (dynamic-enter! (quote-module-path main)) then I just press enter and the 'main

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket: Interactive choice of what submodules to run when clicking Run

In Greg Hendershott's racket-mode for Emacs, the "run" command will run the submodule that's under the cursor. Something similar that would let one right-click a submodule to run it in DrRacket would be quite nice. /David On 01/24/2017 12:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote: There's not a simple way

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket: Interactive choice of what submodules to run when clicking Run

Ok, thanks for the quick answer, Robby. I don't have time currently to try anything deep either, unfortunately. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > There's not a simple way to do that right now, but I think a change to > the code to make that

Re: [racket-users] DrRacket: Interactive choice of what submodules to run when clicking Run

There's not a simple way to do that right now, but I think a change to the code to make that more configurable would be great. It is probably best to make this as a change to DrRacket proper and support a cleaner interface all around. It might be nice to be able to click on things in the

[racket-users] DrRacket: Interactive choice of what submodules to run when clicking Run

Hi all, Currently we can choose what submodules to run via the 'Choose Language...' settings. I'd like to make a keyboard shortcut that executes the current module but first asks the user what submodules she wants to run. So far I found (add-drs-function "run" (λ (frame) (send frame

Re: [racket-users] Mann-Whitney test?

Here is an interesting alternative: https://www.opencpu.org. You communicate with R processes via JSON. So, you wouldn't want a lot of back-and-forth, but I can see doing some setup logic and data prep in Racket, then sending off the JSON request, then interpreting the results. OpenCPU

[racket-users] PLDI workshop and proposal deadline - Jan 30

Reminder! The final deadline for PLDI W proposals is coming up on January 30. Please see the PLDI website for more information. http://conf.researchr.org/track/pldi-2017/pldi-2017-workshops-and-tutorials. Tobias Grosser PLDI Publicity Chair -- You received this message because you are

Re: [racket-users] Safely using port->string where nothing has been written to the port

Hi David, Indeed it does!! Thanks for your help. Sean On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 7:16:58 PM UTC, David K. Storrs wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Does (byte-ready?) work for your case? > >