Can you speak in general terms at RacketCon?
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 3:02 PM, dexterla...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I use Racket daily in production at Mercury Filmworks (Disney TVA, Amazon,
> Netflix productions among others), and I wish I could talk more about how
> Racket helps us where it
I have a shallow understanding of GNU Make, which is only somewhat
less-shallow as a result of recently redesigning my blog to be
Makefile-driven.
In the process I learned to like using make variables. I learned that
a variable can be populated from make functions like $(wildcard)
$(patsubst) and
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:13:47PM +0200, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Hav you tried the make library?
>
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/make/index.html?q=make
Yes. That would work. And that's the kind of answer I was hoping
for. I'd use the make/proc form after using some function calls (with
I think the tool to use depends on what you want to achieve =)
Do you have an example of what you think is missing?
I like the idea that maybe you want to make use racket to
generate some Makefile's to your liking.
Maybe using #lang scribble/text
Best Regards,
David
On 2019-04-16 22:13,
Hav you tried the make library?
https://docs.racket-lang.org/make/index.html?q=make
Den tir. 16. apr. 2019 kl. 21.54 skrev :
> Hendrik,
>
> What is that you are trying to do, maybe you are misunderstanding some
> concept about make?
>
> It seems to me that the whole point of make is to "run a
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 09:54:03PM +0200, da...@erl.nu wrote:
> Hendrik,
>
> What is that you are trying to do, maybe you are misunderstanding some
> concept about make?
>
> It seems to me that the whole point of make is to "run a program" whenever
> some of the files have changed.
Yes, that
Hendrik,
What is that you are trying to do, maybe you are misunderstanding some
concept about make?
It seems to me that the whole point of make is to "run a program"
whenever
some of the files have changed.
Regards,
David
On 2019-04-16 21:25, Hendrik Boom wrote:
I'm sending this here, not
I'm sending this here, not because it's directly related to Racket,
nor because i think you all are experts in make or GNU make, but
because you are reasonable erudite in language appreciation.
I, like many others, have been using a Makefile as a recipe to make a
lot of files from other files.
I use Racket daily in production at Mercury Filmworks (Disney TVA,
Amazon, Netflix productions among others), and I wish I could talk more
about how Racket helps us where it counts. If there was to be an
evangelist, I'd be a candidate, however 1) I don't consider myself a good
Racket
DrRacket: In addition to the open defining file feature that Matthias
mentioned, you might like the File | Open Require Path command.
racket-mode: M-. aka racket-visit-definition and C-c C-x C-f aka
racket-open-require-path are the respective equivalents. [Also C-M-.
aka racket-visit-module when
> On Apr 16, 2019, at 8:31 AM, zeRusski wrote:
>
> I suspect I'm not the first to ask, but my search-fu has failed me here.
> Apologies if the question has already been answered on that list.
>
> When I read Racket docs I sometimes wonder how a particular feature is
> implemented. Looking
I suspect I'm not the first to ask, but my search-fu has failed me here.
Apologies if the question has already been answered on that list.
When I read Racket docs I sometimes wonder how a particular feature is
implemented. Looking at the source sometimes shed light or simply teaches
you
12 matches
Mail list logo
