> On May 6, 2019, at 7:53 AM, zeRusski wrote:
>
> Are there any tutorials that show you how to use things documented in Syntax
> Transformers chapter of the Reference?
>
> How do you debug these scope games?
I agree there is something of a gap in the Racket docs / tooling, because
scopes are
I took a quick look at the implementation of `cross` and `compatible-closure`,
and couldn't make sense of any of it.
For now, I guess I'll manually write out the contexts, and discuss a feature
request.
I spoke to Max a bit about what a compatible closure "ought" to be for mutually
defined
https for lists.racket-lang is not working at the moment. Sorry for
the inconvenience. The server hosting lists.racket-lang went down
recently. A partial temporary non-https version is up but https hasnt
been enabled yet.
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:48 PM David Storrs wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if
I'm not sure if this is relevant or not, but figured I'd mention it. Is
that supposed to be working, or is it obsolete? It does turn up in Google
searches, so maybe worth thinking about.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
> On May 6, 2019, at 10:53 AM, zeRusski wrote:
>
> Suddenly I find myself playing games with hygiene and not really knowing the
> rules.
Hygiene is a default not an absolute. The idea of hygiene is that, unless the
macro writer goes out of his way, the expander assumes that identifiers
Ohh, how could I miss it. Thanks a lot!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
I wrote a macro which introduced an implicit binding <~ so that it could be
used
in expressions at the use-site. Initially did it with
#+begin_src racket
;; inside syntax-parse
(datum->syntax this-syntax #'<~)
#+end_src
followed by macro introduced expr that binds it, then the use-site
At Mon, 6 May 2019 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT), Андрей Кравчук wrote:
> I'm writing bindings for C library that contains some struct declared
> with __attribute__((packed)). How do I mirror such struct in the bindings?
> I wasn't been able to find any reference to packed structs in FFI
>
Hello!
I'm writing bindings for C library that contains some struct declared
with __attribute__((packed)). How do I mirror such struct in the bindings?
I wasn't been able to find any reference to packed structs in FFI
documentation.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Racket talks are very welcome at BOB!
Summer BOB Conference 2019
"What happens when we use what's best for a change?"
http://bobkonf.de/2019-summer/cfc.html
Berlin, August 21
co-located with ICFP 2019
If you record, say, the 100 most recent function calls and their
arguments, then you should be able to maintain proper space use as
well as provide as much information as needed.
Sam
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 5:45 PM Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>
>
> On May 3, 2019, at 4:17 AM, Mark Engelberg
11 matches
Mail list logo