Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
Thank you for writing this. On Sat, Jul 20, 2019 at 11:49 AM Matthew Flatt wrote: > Possible Language Changes > - > > The Racket community has long discussed possibilities for Racket2. Here > are a few potential changes from the wish list: I like this list of changes. I'

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Jay McCarthy
As a procedural matter, I think that the Github repository is a great way to communicate about specific ideas in way that ideas stay connected and don't get forgotten. https://github.com/racket/racket2-rfcs/ Right now, basically all of the discussion is in the issues, as people work together to g

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread stewart mackenzie
Let's keep this light and fun, especially for the implementor, who shouldn't be bogged down with parens-or-die commentry. How about treating it as yet another #lang, albeit one of interest as core members have an itch to scratch. Let's cross the bridge of moving docs/website/drastic stuff when ther

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Hi Matthew, As someone who (unintentionally) caused maybe some of the debate to get out of hand (or did I?) I would like to open by saying that both your last email to the prior thread and also this email are both very encouraging. I'll skip everything else and jump straight to: Matthew Flatt wr

Re: [racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Matthew Flatt wrote on 7/20/19 2:49 PM: We need concrete examples to discuss the possibility of changing syntax, potential roadmaps to see whether there's anywhere we want to go, and so on. Procedural suggestions people might want to do: * There's a lot of prior work, and it might really help

Re: Backing up [was: Re: [racket-users] The case, and a proposal, for elegant syntax in #lang racket2]

2019-07-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:55:03 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote: > [...] > I think it would be a mistake to skip this discussion. Agreed, so I'll offer my take on these specific questions, at least if you'll humor my read of "more popular" as "lower barrier". At Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:55:03 -0400, Greg H

[racket-users] Racket2 possibilities

2019-07-20 Thread Matthew Flatt
This message is intended as a prose form of what I said at RacketCon, but it includes some extra explanation triggered by the discussion so far. Where that happens, I apologize that it isn't in the form of a more direct response in the original thread. The Racket2 Idea Racket's d

Re: [racket-users] Re: Gui editable grid/table

2019-07-20 Thread Neil Van Dyke
FWIW, I *might* very soon be making such an editable table/spreadsheet widget that scales to large data and supports various types, and in a cross-platform way.  (Without hitting various limits of some platform native widgets as used by Racket's GUI layer.  I recently looked at a few related pa

Re: [racket-users] (ninth RacketCon) videos

2019-07-20 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Just to be clear, YouTube is clearly a very pragmatic way to make the RacketCon videos most accessible to people, and I'm very glad it's done. Many people will stream the videos through YouTube, and (thanks to "youtube-dl.org") it's currently also an easy way to distribute the data to various

Re: [racket-users] Re: Gui editable grid/table

2019-07-20 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
There is also the spreadsheet-editor package, but I haven’t used it yet https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/spreadsheet-editor Let us know how you get on Kind regards Stephen On Sat, 20 Jul 2019 at 05:13, Travis Hinkelman wrote: > Hi Raoul, > > Matthias Felleisen is working on a Racket impl