Re: [racket-users] Re: Alternative UI toolkits

2019-08-07 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Thanks Neil. Mathematica uses QT! Noice. For my own reference - https://github.com/servo/webrender/ 'experimental render backend for Servo , but it can also be used as such in a standalone application.' - https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-01-unsafe-rust.html#using-extern-func

[racket-users] Honu thoughts and clarification

2019-08-07 Thread Christopher Lemmer Webber
Today I read the 2012 Honu paper: http://www.cs.utah.edu/~rafkind/papers/honu-2012.pdf Some impressions and a question: - Well it's pretty obvious where I stand on my preference for lisp syntax. But! I'll say the Honu paper is beautifully written and is maybe the nicest non-s-expressi

Re: [racket-users] [racket users] module question

2019-08-07 Thread Kevin Forchione
> On Aug 7, 2019, at 8:55 AM, Kevin Forchione wrote: > > > >> On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:06 PM, Sorawee Porncharoenwase > > wrote: >> >> (module B racket >> (require (submod ".." A)) >> (printf "X=~a~%" X)) > > Why doesn’t printf display anything ? Oh, wait.

Re: [racket-users] [racket users] module question

2019-08-07 Thread Kevin Forchione
> On Aug 6, 2019, at 4:06 PM, Sorawee Porncharoenwase > wrote: > > (module B racket > (require (submod ".." A)) > (printf "X=~a~%" X)) Why doesn’t printf display anything ? Kevin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To un

Re: [racket-users] Re: Alternative UI toolkits

2019-08-07 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Since I mentioned the Qt GUI toolkit family (which you might also know as a foundation of KDE)... * if anyone is looking at that for Racket for some reason, there's a new "technical vision" statement for the next major version: https://blog.qt.io/blog/2019/08/07/technical-vision-qt-6/ I'm ha

[racket-users] Re: [racket users] module question

2019-08-07 Thread Luis Sanjuán
As Sorawee has said. To expand a bit. First, #lang modname is a shorthand for: (module a-name modname) where a-name derives from the filename. So, modules within are actually submodules. On the other hand, the .. in the submod is a relative module path. The symbol is borrowed, I believe, fr