Re: [racket-users] Re: Improved synchronous concurrency example for rosettacode.org ?

On Saturday, August 17, 2019 at 6:56:29 AM UTC-4, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > Thanks Brian > This is great! > > Stephen > > My pleasure. By the way, here are unimplemented tasks for Racket if people want to contribute solutions:

Re: [racket-users] Re: The case, and a proposal, for elegant syntax in #lang racket2

HI all, I would personally be unhappy if in racketlang2 we would remove the (). I don't think they represent a real issue. Just to share my personal experience a professional programmer. I learned clojure like 7 months ago and now I'm learning racketlang and I never felt the () as a

Re: [racket-users] Re: [standard-fish] Summer competiton 2019

This contest is a bright idea, so here's a standard lightbulb: [image: default-lightbulb.png] The code is at https://gist.github.com/LiberalArtist/4d0059f5af23043515a3cc74bd4928c2 -Philip On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:05 PM Stephen De Gabrielle < spdegabrie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Amazing face!

Re: [racket-users] Re: Improved synchronous concurrency example for rosettacode.org ?

Thanks Brian This is great! Stephen On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 09:09, Brian Adkins wrote: > On Friday, August 16, 2019 at 6:46:14 PM UTC-4, Brian Adkins wrote: >> >> I went ahead and added my version to the Racket section w/ some subtle >> changes from my original post. I'm happy to edit it if