At Fri, 27 Dec 2019 14:01:33 +0300, Dmitry Pavlov wrote:
> Because on my good ol' Windows XP machine, the Utah i386 nigtly build, while
> installing successfully, resulted in a Racket executable that the system
> refused to run, saying that it is not a correct executable. (The message was
> loca
I don't think there is precedent in Racket for stuff like this. There
are quite a few programs that have really long comments at their start
that explain how they work and for the Web server, there's a separate
section of the docs that have a bunch of random sub-pieces documented
--- https://docs.r
2 matches
Mail list logo
