On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 04:46:56PM -0600, Spencer Florence wrote:
> Moral of this story: the pkg-build server configuration can have bugs in
> it. Therefore, if you don't test it, it will have bugs in it
"That which is not tested is broken."
-- Anon.
I wish I knew where I first heard this.
Another solution: If you are inside DrRacket, you can use the button "Check
Syntax".
Gustavo
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:13 PM Marc Kaufmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the way I currently check my web server is by simply running `racket
> server.rkt` on the command line. However, this also launches the
Moral of this story: the pkg-build server configuration can have bugs in
it. Therefore, if you don't test it, it will have bugs in it
--spencer
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:28 PM Stephen Foster
wrote:
> On further investigation, cover just seems to be broken, older versions
> install without
On further investigation, cover just seems to be broken, older versions
install without errors. I'll open a ticket on that repo.
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 1:14 PM Stephen Foster
wrote:
> I have a Dockerized racket app that has (today, I think) started failing
> with errors related to the "cover"
I have a Dockerized racket app that has (today, I think) started failing
with errors related to the "cover" package. I don't use cover -- though I
assume one of my dependencies does. Adding "cover" explicitly to my
info.rkt file doesn't fix the issue.
What might be going wrong here? And
At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two or
even three editors.
https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/
s.
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:05 PM Stephen De Gabrielle <
spdegabrie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> at 18 responses
> [image: Three-set Venn diagram (at 18
6 matches
Mail list logo
