On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 9:54 AM Shriram Krishnamurthi
wrote:
> Thank you all!
>
> *Dave*, the documentation style is fine, it's sometimes easier to read
> the doc right next to the implementation. (-:
>
> However, I'm not quite sure how even your example works. Maybe someone can
> check my
Hi,
I have:
#lang scribble/manual
@(require (for-label racket) scribble/eval)
@interaction[
(let ((set 1)) (add1 set))]
I prepare a HTML document with DrRacket (in Windows 10).
Works, but local variable set is hyperlinked to procedure set in the documents
(racket/set). I would like this
I realized a little while after writing my previous message that I was probably
misinterpreting you. I was envisioning you using box-cas! on a box containing a
functional queue, so there would be no need to synchronize. You’d just pull the
queue out of the box, functionally update it, and use
> On May 24, 2020, at 02:10, Dominik Pantůček
> wrote:
>
> At first I was surprised that you are basically suggesting using
> spinlocks (busy-wait loops) instead of futex-backed (at least on Linux)
> fsemaphores. That is a waste of CPU time.
Performing CAS operations in a loop isn’t really
On 24. 05. 20 3:38, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Sat, 23 May 2020 18:51:23 +0200, Dominik Pantůček wrote:
>> But that is just where the issue is showing up. The real question is how
>> the counter gets decremented twice (given that fsemaphores should be
>> futures-safe).
>
> I found a
5 matches
Mail list logo
