On 02.01.21 01:19, Hendrik Boom wrote:
So evidently something isn't working properly here, either; even though
I do have a reply-to-list function.
Is there something else subtly wrong with the mail headers? Or do I
have to do something weird to mutt to get it to behave?
I think there should
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 10:56:01PM +, Sage Gerard wrote:
> > "Proper mail systems" "Now you know the reason" grrr g!
>
> Relax, I come in peace.
>
> Clients aren't created equal. I don't have a "reply to list" button.
> I have "Reply" and "Reply All". I went through some settings to see
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 10:53:14PM +0100, Dominik Pantůček wrote:
>
> >
> > Proper mail systems also provide a command "reply to list". The proper
> > fix is to make sure your mail system supports reply to list.
> >
>
> Which seems to work only if the list is in the "To:" header - not "Cc:".
Alright, I think I see how I confused myself.
I load modules in my language dynamically. I use sandboxed evaluators instead
of dynamic-require. I used replace-context on the entire module body to make
the evaluators see values that I defined and provided during expansion. The
problem was that
Dominik*, apologies.
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 5:56 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> > "Proper mail systems" "Now you know the reason" grrr g!
>
> Relax, I come in peace.
>
> Clients aren't created equal. I don't have a "reply to list" button.
> I have
> "Proper mail systems" "Now you know the reason" grrr g!
Relax, I come in peace.
Clients aren't created equal. I don't have a "reply to list" button.
I have "Reply" and "Reply All". I went through some settings to see
if there's a way to enable the feature, but no luck.
I do, however, have
>
> Proper mail systems also provide a command "reply to list". The proper
> fix is to make sure your mail system supports reply to list.
>
Which seems to work only if the list is in the "To:" header - not "Cc:".
At least that is how my Thunderbird apparently works...
Dominik
--
You
On Fri, Jan 01, 2021 at 04:31:56PM +, Sage Gerard wrote:
> The Reply-To experience for this list seems wrong.
>
> Clicking normal "Reply" sets the reply to the person who last sent an email
> to the thread, but not the list address.
>
> Clicking "Reply All" sends a copy of the email to an
Alright, thank you for sticking with this. I'm refactoring now.
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 11:56 AM, Jay McCarthy
wrote:
> I’d imagine that you would only provide program and the modifiers. Everything
> well work out :)
>
> Jay
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at
I’d imagine that you would only provide program and the modifiers.
Everything well work out :)
Jay
On Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 11:44 AM Sage Gerard wrote:
> Ah, I see. Thank you for that!
>
> As for rephrasing my original question: If program were provided as
> #%module-begin, I expect that
Ah, I see. Thank you for that!
As for rephrasing my original question: If program were provided as
#%module-begin, I expect that syntax-protect would prevent a programmer from
using out the phase-0 bindings. But in my version of the program Racket would
keep complaining about unbound
The Reply-To experience for this list seems wrong.
Clicking normal "Reply" sets the reply to the person who last sent an email to
the thread, but not the list address.
Clicking "Reply All" sends a copy of the email to an increasingly larger list
of people, with the mail list CC'd. The extra
12 matches
Mail list logo
