Re: [racket-users] Smart contracts in Racket

2021-04-20 Thread Adam Golding
Thanks Stephen, perhaps you can help get the ball rolling again--I had written to suggest that racketers may want to enter the moralis hackathon as there are some points of convergence: - racket seeks to bridge multiple languages, moralis seeks to bridge multiple blockchains with different smart

Re: [racket-users] Smart contracts in Racket

2021-04-20 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Dear all, I write to apologise for my behaviour. I inappropriately deleted a post and subsequent discussion from the Racket Discord. I believe this community is for all kinds of developers making all kinds of programs with Racket, and I want everyone to feel welcome to participate in

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket: type relations

2021-04-20 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:19 PM Dominik Pantůček wrote: > > >>> > >>> However, I would suggest that the right fix here is to use refinement > >>> types, and specify exactly what you want. Unfortunately, the > >>> refinement types feature (good intro here: > >>>

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket: type relations

2021-04-20 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
It's a little more complicated than that -- the _constraints_ have to be linear -- that is, the expressions in the refinements, but the expressions reasoned about can be more general. However, it doesn't do very much useful with multiplication by bounded values at the moment. Sam On Mon, Apr 19,

[racket-users] Re: Understanding recursion in the function normalize-definition form the racket sources

2021-04-20 Thread 'Wayne Harris' via Racket Users
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:02:00 -0700 (PDT) Dan Synek wrote: > I am trying to implement a variation of define. In order to do that I am > trying to understand the source of the define macro in racket. > It calls a function normalize-definition which looks like this: > (define-values

Re: [racket-users] Add Link to the racket Discord to the racket website?

2021-04-20 Thread schle...@gmail.com
@Adam What I see with your link is a giant wall of text, It is quite overwhelming to get greeted by huge correspondence like that. This thread was simply about helping somebody who wants to find help with basic racket problems find a place where there are people who can help in an interactive

Re: [racket-users] Add Link to the racket Discord to the racket website?

2021-04-20 Thread Adam Golding
IRC + Matrix? I've just been using mIRC, lol On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 04:45, Yury Bulka wrote: > Just my 5 cents... > > Recently I had to register on a discord "server" to ask a question > within another community - and the experience was of a high barrier of > entry. I needed to provide my age,

Re: [racket-users] Add Link to the racket Discord to the racket website?

2021-04-20 Thread Yury Bulka
Just my 5 cents... Recently I had to register on a discord "server" to ask a question within another community - and the experience was of a high barrier of entry. I needed to provide my age, confirm my email, then (that might be an issue of that particular "server" - I'm not sure) I was forced

Re: [racket-users] Add Link to the racket Discord to the racket website?

2021-04-20 Thread Adam Golding
I'm not so sure now: https://groups.google.com/g/racket-users/c/SkJAKkQhlgw On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 03:39, Adam Golding wrote: > seconded > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 14:56, schle...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> >> The racket discord is managed quite well, I think it should be added to >> the racket

Re: [racket-users] Typed Racket: type relations

2021-04-20 Thread Dominik Pantůček
>> Of course Ben's hint at unsafe-reprovide is something I'd like to >> investigate. > > My hint turned into a PR and merged a few years ago. > https://github.com/racket/typed-racket/pull/657 > I read that one yesterday - it does not address the issue fully. I meant the hint at really