This is like being a child, waking up and realizing its christmas (and
easter at the same time),
thank you for working on this, I will test out this shiny new toy/gift
(meant in the best possible way).
Because I am on linux, I will try to cross compile to windows (time to dust
off my windows
Ah, you're right. I'm still acclimated to BC here. Disregard!
On 5/14/21 7:30 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Sage Gerard writes:
>
>> I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
>> be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
>> when that language
Hi David,
On 2021-05-13, 13:12 -0400, David Storrs wrote:
> Incidentally, a more concise way of doing this would be:
>
> (define target (build-path "tarzan")) ; convert to path only once
> (for/or ([item (in-directory "/tmp/test")]) ; or whatever directory
> you want to start in
> (equal?
Sage Gerard writes:
> I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
> be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
> when that language can freely ignore the Racket printer and write
> directly to STDOUT within the same operating system process.
Jon Zeppieri writes:
> Can you use BinaryenModuleWriteText instead? It looks like it was
> added to address your use case. -J
Good point and nice catch.
Although it doesn't solve the issue with racket it does provide a way
out for me to create a safe binding for this function that works
5 matches
Mail list logo
