> On 20 Aug 2020, at 18:22, Sorawee Porncharoenwase
> wrote:
>
> Is this intended to be something like https://docs.racket-lang.org/scaffold/?
That also looks extremely useful!
James
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To
Just to note that I would find this sort of thing very useful.
I have struggled to package my command-line app in a way that makes it easily
accessible to my colleagues (a mixture of Python developers on Macs using
homebrew and non-developers on corporate Windows systems using who knows what).
Stephen, All,
I think that is likely to be right. For now, I’ve kept my room booking but if
the Turing or the British Library close, I will let you know.
James
> On 13 Mar 2020, at 21:39, Stephen De Gabrielle
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> While I haven't yet, I'm expecting it will be
That sounds a great idea, I am interested.
For numbers less than about 10, if it helps, I can get a meeting room in the
Turing Institute (though I’m also happy to try a coffee shop, not that I have
any good suggestions).
James
> On 24 Feb 2020, at 21:41, Stephen De Gabrielle
> wrote:
>
Alex, many thanks for the suggestions.
I feel I’m putting too many obstacles in the way. (On the other hand, perhaps
my situation is not so unusual.) I’m trying to make something work with as few
barriers as possible, both for experienced (but non-Racket!) developers, and
for Mac users who
; b) using the create executable function in DrRacket (or raco) to build a
> stand-alone version that can be modified to distribute via homebrew
>
> Kind regards
>
> Stephen
>
> PS I think this is a great idea that I’m sure others will use.
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2019
Dear All,
For reasons (explained below, possibly foolish reasons) I am trying to do the
following:
1. Have `raco pkg install` install a package X to a specific directory,
including, in the same directory, all of the dependencies of X, but excluding
those dependencies that are already present
Given that I work inside the Library building, I will try to drop by!
(I also have a Racket sticker on my laptop. Will be there around 12:30.)
James
> On 12 Jul 2019, at 16:20, Stephen De Gabrielle
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Next Friday, 19 July at 12pm-3pm there will be an impromptu Racket
Dear Bob,
My sense is that there are, perhaps, two questions: first, what's the advantage
of Racket when faced with a "prosaic computational task where ... my brain
defaults to writing in something like C"?; and second, how to advocate for
Racket when Python (appears to be) "quite a bit
I am also interested in this problem, because many of my colleagues use Python
and "isn't Python faster?" is a common argument. (Albeit one that I think is
more of a rationalisation than an reason.)
In this case, however, I would not have thought that there's any prima facie
reason why the
Many thanks Joel,
I do agree that `raco distribute` seems the way to go. Indeed, the setup
described in the blog post you shared is just what I’m currently doings (so
it’s nice to know I’m not doing something too crazy!).
What gave me pause, however, was that homebrew seems to discourage
Dear All,
Does anyone have experience sharing a Racket program using homebrew, for users
who may or may not have the Racket distribution installed? (Homebrew is a
popular package management system for the Mac.)
In particular, I'd like to ensure that a certain Racket package (gregor) is
Racket are you using? I get a segfault in 7.2, but 7.3
> > > > works for me.
> > >
> > > I see the segfault in 7.1 but not in 7.2 or 7.3. Then I run it under
> > > valgrind and I see it in all the versions. :)
> > > It's there, but sometimes hiding
I'm using version 7.3, amusingly.
James
> On 5 Jun 2019, at 15:47, Philip McGrath wrote:
>
> What version of Racket are you using? I get a segfault in 7.2, but 7.3 works
> for me.
> -Philip
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 10:42 AM James Geddes wrote:
> Dear Al
Dear All,
The following Typed Racket program is intended to produce an image of the
Mandelbrot set (but it doesn't bother actually displaying the image).
Running the program using command-line Racket causes a crash. Specifically,
Racket terminates with the error message:
Segmentation
Dear All,
The following output from Typed Racket is unexpected -- to me! -- can someone
confirm whether I should have expected it or that it's (perhaps) a bug or known
limitation?
> % racket -I typed/racket
>
> Welcome to Racket v7.3.
>
> > (for/vector ([i (in-range 5)]) i)
> - : (Vectorof
on the basics; and exhaustive references that seem to contain
both more than I want and less than I need.
Thank you to everyone who has worked on the documentation.
James
James Geddes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users&q
I'm in London - not active on this list, but trying to work out how to promote
Racket in my industry. (I'm building a data science team and I just struggle to
like Python.)
I'd be delighted if there were a European meeting, obviously the UK better for
me but I appreciate borders are a pain.
Matthias,
Thank you, that's really helpful, both for letting me know I'm not being an
idiot (always welcome!) and for the example code, which makes me realise I
should learn about exceptions next.
Many thanks again,
James
---
James Geddes
--
You received
untyped module.
Any help much appreciated!
James
---
James Geddes
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to ra
20 matches
Mail list logo
