Re: [racket-users] Racket Guide, REs, section 9.5

2018-11-09 Thread Jussi Salmela
Thanks for answering. I was at my wits’ end trying to think how the behavior of those two would differ and even tried a couple of experiments, to no avail unfortunately. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

[racket-users] Racket Guide, REs, section 9.5

2018-11-06 Thread Jussi Salmela
At the end of section 9.5 there is the sentence: The non-greedy quantifiers are respectively: *?, +?, ??, {m}?, {m,n}?. I don't understand what {m}? is supposed to match because {m} means 'match exactly the previous pattern'. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [racket-users] Confused by the behavior of hash->list

2018-08-17 Thread Jussi Salmela
Cool, thanks! On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:26 PM Paulo Matos wrote: > > > On 17/08/18 18:18, Jussi Salmela wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > (I'm on 7.0) > > Just to jump right to the point here are the hash example lines from the > User Guide and a few added lines wit