On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:47:18 -0400
Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
Hello Matthias,
> Your mail calls for a philosophical answer. If this were Eiffel, you
> would be correct.
Recently I stumbled upon some application discovering it is written in Eiffel
and I had become curious to investigate a bit abo
Asumu Takikawa writes:
> One thing that's not portable is the fonts that you use. You will
> probably have to install the same fonts or ensure that you only
> use fonts that are available on both machines.
Hmm…that might be problematic considering I do not have any clue which
fonts are on ’prese
Matthias Felleisen
writes:
>> is it safe to prepare it on Linux and ’execute’ under Linux
>> by putting the whole environment on USB stick?
>
>
> Yes.
Ahh, I wanted to ask "to prepare under Linux" and "execute under
Windows". :-(
> (I have no experience w/ non-technical presentations.)
OK.
Hello,
I’m (slowly) working through Realm of Racket being interested to use it
for several programming projects. However, I’m also enthusiastic to
embrac Slideshow library and wonder if someone can share his/her
experiences about using it for non-technical presentations?
In the past I was using L
Eli Barzilay writes:
> A sign that you're a dinosaur.
Isn’t that nice these days? ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
You have a right to perform your prescribed duty, but you
are not entitled to the fruits of action. Never consider
yourself the cause of the results of your activities,
and never be attach
Hello,
I'd like to install Emacs mode for Scribble and according to the docs
here are two methods, I did try the 2nd one which says:
Evaluate the following Racket code to install the PLaneT package
without modifying your Emacs setup.
(require (planet neil/scribble-emacs))
since I use Spacemac
Gustavo Massaccesi
writes:
> One advantage of JS is tht you can run it in every browser in every
> computer in the word.
Right, but, isn't it that Racket's GUI work in, at least, every major
platform (Linux/BSD, Mac, Windows) using platform's native toolkit,
which is quite sufficient for me?
S
Richard Cleis writes:
> - To claim progress, most people want to make only minimum changes to
> their way of doing things.
>
> - To claim progress, most people do not want to make any change at all
> to their way of *thinking* about things.
So true - obstacle to the change!
> I enjoy the freedo
"Jos Koot" writes:
Hello Jos,
> I am a Racket-using hobbyist. It surprises me that, according to the
> observation, not many hobbyists are using Racket.
Seeing so much proliferation of JS crap it looks like people are really
going insane. :-)
> I did programming in a lot of languages, assemble
Neil Van Dyke writes:
> Being non-mainstream for practitioners, Racket is most popular with
> people who have the freedom to choose any tools they want, not forced
> into a mainstream set of options. Most often this means individual
> alpha techies, researchers, etc.
That's true, but still wonde
Hello,
almost year ago I've become interested in Racket, but due to several
reasons it did fall by the wayside. :-(
Recently I decided to migrate most of my tool-chain to Emacs (editor,
org-mode, Gnus...) and then, naturally, when considering about learning
some Elisp, I've remembered my past enc
11 matches
Mail list logo