On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Eric Dobson
> wrote:
> > Is it 'wrong' to add a disappeared-use property onto a syntax object
> > even if the use wasn't actually disappeared? Its not very obvious what
> > semantics these syntax proper
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Eric Dobson wrote:
> Is it 'wrong' to add a disappeared-use property onto a syntax object
> even if the use wasn't actually disappeared? Its not very obvious what
> semantics these syntax properties are supposed to have.
I would take an operational view of the sem
Is it 'wrong' to add a disappeared-use property onto a syntax object
even if the use wasn't actually disappeared? Its not very obvious what
semantics these syntax properties are supposed to have.
The situation I'm in is that the code that determines examines the
bindings is somewhat separate from
3 matches
Mail list logo