I just finished my test framework, based on Scribble and RackUnit.
https://github.com/digital-world/DigiGnome
http://gyoudmon.org/~wargrey:DigiGnome
At the beginning, I focused on BDD,
later I noticed that BDD is a thinking patten more than a coding pattern,
and to not lose the purpose of communic
> Short version: I think it's a good idea. I don't know of anything like
> that, yet. I'm interested in BDD, but not so much a Gherkin style DSL.
Yeah, I currently have no plans to implement something like Gherkin. All I care
about for the time being is spec-style `describe`, `context`, `it`, and
By the way eCukes is here:
https://github.com/ecukes/ecukes
> ... At most I've been tempted
> to poach some of the Elisp definitions underlying the Gherkin DSL and
> use them directly.
What I meant here is the step definitions in eSpuds:
https://github.com/ecukes/espuds
--
You received t
Short version: I think it's a good idea. I don't know of anything like
that, yet. I'm interested in BDD, but not so much a Gherkin style DSL.
I've considered using eCukes for the Emacs Lisp part of racket-mode.
After having seen it used in some contemporary Emacs packages. And
after watching some
RackUnit is a good tool, but the interface it provides is pretty bare-bones.
It’s mostly just assertions, with a few grouping utilities like test-case and
test-suite. The core is solid, but I think it would be nice to have BDD-style
assertions on top, and I was wondering if such a project alread
5 matches
Mail list logo
