On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:08 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Are there other useful variants that are not currently supported (at least
> directly)?
>
I think the answer to this is “no.” My reasoning follows.
>From the perspective of subclasses, superclass methods come in three sorts:
overridable,
I agree that this doesn't look possible within a single class, but I
don't see any problem with the pattern (aside from being awkward to
write). As far as I can tell, it would make sense for `class` to
support new a case that fuses your `overment` plus `augride` steps.
Internally, that would
On 7/17/2021 1:10 AM, Alexis King wrote:
:
a complex, possibly error-prone, way to front-end class method dispatch
:
This brings me to my question: is there any simpler way to do this?
And are there any hidden gotchas to my technique?
I'm still trying to understand how it works.
Hello,
While doing some OOP in Racket today, I found myself in a situation that
would benefit from two seemingly contradictory things:
1.
I want to be able to override a superclass method, and I want to be
certain that I get to handle the method before any of my subclasses do.
This
4 matches
Mail list logo
