On 12/21/2019 9:25 PM, Matt Jadud wrote:
My off-list thought (which was largely because I wasn't sure it would
even work) was to run a second web server on another port that was
bound to localhost. Then, SSH onto the localhost when needed, and
squirt values into the locally bound webserver as
The other advice here is good and could help to implement a more principled
solution. But, if you want to do something equivalent to editing a running
application's database on the fly, just using Racket values instead of a
DB, I would build on `file-box`:
https://docs.racket-lang.org/web-server/st
Thanks George and Matt, those look great.
I think I'll try to implement your version later George, as the
syntax-parse makes me sure I'll screw up. However it looks like a really
nice way to contain what can be changed/updated, while adding things
flexibly to it. And it should be possible to combi
My off-list thought (which was largely because I wasn't sure it would even
work) was to run a second web server on another port that was bound to
localhost. Then, SSH onto the localhost when needed, and squirt values into
the locally bound webserver as needed. Depending on the server config
(e.g.,
On 12/21/2019 4:44 AM, Marc Kaufmann wrote:
one useful feature of the Django web framework is that it is easy to
access the database and change it on the fly. I am not using a DB, but
a hash inside of Racket for various reasons. I understand that it
would be easy to connect to a database in an
Hi all,
one useful feature of the Django web framework is that it is easy to access
the database and change it on the fly. I am not using a DB, but a hash
inside of Racket for various reasons. I understand that it would be easy to
connect to a database in any language, and getting the hash is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
