Re: [racket-users] Debugging Judgements in Redex?

2019-01-07 Thread Joey Eremondi
Perfect, that did the trick, thanks! On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 7:52:40 PM UTC-8, Robby Findler wrote: > > Did you try using `current-traced-metafunctions` ? It is poorly named, > I know. And, even worse, I see that the docs don't actually say that > it traces judgment forms too. > >

Re: [racket-users] Debugging Judgements in Redex?

2019-01-02 Thread Robby Findler
Did you try using `current-traced-metafunctions` ? It is poorly named, I know. And, even worse, I see that the docs don't actually say that it traces judgment forms too. Robby On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 9:18 PM Joey Eremondi wrote: > > I'm wondering, is there a way to show some sort of trace for a

[racket-users] Debugging Judgements in Redex?

2019-01-02 Thread Joey Eremondi
I'm wondering, is there a way to show some sort of trace for a call to judgment-holds that returns '() or #f? I'm in a situation where a judgment that I expect to hold does not, and it's tricky to find out by hand where it is failing. The #mode requirement for the judgments suggests an obvious