Re: [racket-users] Dumb lexical scope question

2016-03-07 Thread brendan
Ah, of course, I forgot all about that. I read that paper a while back but I never felt that I really "got" it; it was easy to see the problems that were being solved, but hard to see that the given solutions were correct. I'll have to go through it again now that I've used the system a little

Re: [racket-users] Dumb lexical scope question

2016-03-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 7 Mar 2016 03:52:39 -0800 (PST), brendan wrote: > I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here. In the Guide, introducing syntax > objects, it says: > > "Most notably, free-identifier=? determines whether two identifiers refer to > the same binding: > > ... > > (free-identifier=? #'car

[racket-users] Dumb lexical scope question

2016-03-07 Thread brendan
I'm sure I'm missing something obvious here. In the Guide, introducing syntax objects, it says: "Most notably, free-identifier=? determines whether two identifiers refer to the same binding: ... (free-identifier=? #'car (let ([car 8]) #'car)) The last example