Re: [racket-users] How can I increase expansion+compilation speed?

2020-07-20 Thread Ryan Kramer
Thanks Ryan, the macro profiler is great! It quickly identified a macro that I was able to convert to a procedure. (I'm not sure why I made it a macro in the first place.) And the .zo file decreased from about 910KB to 130KB, and the compilation speed went from 40 seconds to about 8 seconds

Re: [racket-users] How can I increase expansion+compilation speed?

2020-07-20 Thread Ryan Culpepper
One thing to check is the size of the resulting bytecode file. When I compiled it, I got a 911 KB .zo file. So the most likely reason is that your macros are just producing a lot of code. You can run the macro profiler (eg, `raco macro-profiler aw-schema.rkt`) to get a summary of what macros

Re: [racket-users] How can I increase expansion+compilation speed?

2020-07-20 Thread Linus Björnstam
40s to compile seems rather excessive, considering macros like match that also do a lot of work are instant, almost regardless of their size (I once managed to generate a 2000 line (match ...) and hardly noticed). Is there anything in define-schema that makes it non-linear? Do you process

[racket-users] How can I increase expansion+compilation speed?

2020-07-19 Thread Ryan Kramer
Using DrRacket, the following file takes 18 seconds to compile without debugging, or about 40 seconds to compile with debugging: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/default-kramer/plisqin-tutorials/e844825b48137553246c64e73516d880b9068825/define-schema-answer-key/aw-schema.rkt When I say