Le mardi 13 juin 2017 23:49:23 UTC+2, Alex Knauth a écrit :
> I'm imagining the existing DrRacket indentation rules would be expressed as:
>
> […]
This seems like a nice concise notation, although it is a bit cryptic at first
sight :) .
I'm not quite sure if if covers the following case (where
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>
> The problem arises when I need to break the line before [y ys]. DrRacket
> insists on indentation [y ys] to be below [x xs] rather han below [v vs].
>
> That is, I get:
>
> (for ([v vs] [x xs]
>[y ys])
> body
Hi All,
Is there an option in DrRacket to change the indentation of for-clauses?
The situation is as follows: There are several parellel for-clauses, so I
like write
(for ([v vs] [x xs] [y ys])
body)
The problem arises when I need to break the line before [y ys]. DrRacket
insists on ind
3 matches
Mail list logo