Re: [racket-users] Indentation of for-clauses

2017-06-15 Thread Dupéron Georges
Le mardi 13 juin 2017 23:49:23 UTC+2, Alex Knauth a écrit : > I'm imagining the existing DrRacket indentation rules would be expressed as: > > […] This seems like a nice concise notation, although it is a bit cryptic at first sight :) . I'm not quite sure if if covers the following case (where

Re: [racket-users] Indentation of for-clauses

2017-06-13 Thread Alex Knauth
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > > The problem arises when I need to break the line before [y ys]. DrRacket > insists on indentation [y ys] to be below [x xs] rather han below [v vs]. > > That is, I get: > > (for ([v vs] [x xs] >[y ys]) > body

[racket-users] Indentation of for-clauses

2017-06-13 Thread Jens Axel Søgaard
Hi All, Is there an option in DrRacket to change the indentation of for-clauses? The situation is as follows: There are several parellel for-clauses, so I like write (for ([v vs] [x xs] [y ys]) body) The problem arises when I need to break the line before [y ys]. DrRacket insists on ind