Re: [racket-users] Plumbum for racket

2017-10-25 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
On 24/10/17 20:40, Jon Zeppieri wrote: > Featured at the recent RacketCon: > http://docs.racket-lang.org/rash@rash/index.html > Thanks guys, I think rash is pretty much what I was looking for. -- Paulo Matos -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [racket-users] Plumbum for racket

2017-10-24 Thread William G Hatch
I wrote a couple of libraries that address this. As was mentioned, there's Rash, which lets you swap back and forth between normal racket and a more bash-like syntax for running pipelines. There's also the shell-pipeline package, which provides the runtime functions behind rash and lets you run

Re: [racket-users] Plumbum for racket

2017-10-24 Thread Jon Zeppieri
Featured at the recent RacketCon: http://docs.racket-lang.org/rash@rash/index.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [racket-users] Plumbum for racket

2017-10-24 Thread Neil Van Dyke
A long time ago, Olin Shivers, et al., made Scsh.  I don't know whether anyone ever ported that to Racket. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scsh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[racket-users] Plumbum for racket

2017-10-24 Thread 'Paulo Matos' via Racket Users
Hi, In Python I see myself using plumbum (https://plumbum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) on a regular basis to do shell related stuff instead of messing with subprocesses. Is there anything remotely like this for racket? Kind regards, -- Paulo Matos -- You received this message because you are