[racket-users] R7RS

2019-05-24 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Does anyone know of a summary of R7RS-Small changes relative to R5RS (not relative to R6RS)? (I'm aware of "http://andykeep.com/SchemeWorkshop2015/papers/sfpw1-2015-clinger.pdf";, which addresses a different question.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: [racket-users] R7RS implementation's installation

2017-06-27 Thread Gustavo Massaccesi
(Just guessing) Do you have a proxy in the university? Can you install other packages that are not part of the main distribution, for example https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/cond-strict ? Gustavo On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 6:44 PM, Jean-Michel HUFFLEN wrote: >Dear Racket developers, > >

[racket-users] R7RS implementation's installation

2017-06-22 Thread Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
Dear Racket developers, On my personal computer, I successfully installed the package for the nonofficial implementation of R7RS in Racket. But I didn't this operation at my university, the answer is https://... proxy web incorrect address I searched the documentation but I don'

Re: [racket-users] R7RS implementation

2016-06-09 Thread Alexis King
Hey, I’m the maintainer of the R7RS library. I’d appreciate it if you filed those issues as bugs on the GitHub repository here: https://github.com/lexi-lambda/racket-r7rs I’m glad you found value in the library, and I’d love to try and fix some of the problems you mentioned, especially since a

[racket-users] R7RS implementation

2016-06-09 Thread Jean-Michel HUFFLEN
Dear Racket developers and users, I've just tried the non-official implementation of R7RS in Racket. Three points: - if you define a library, you can write something like: (define-library (something) (export ...) (import ...) (define another-thing ...) (define year-another ...

Re: [racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

2015-10-26 Thread Matthew Flatt
I think a per-version switch would be reasonable. Another approach is to register a different checksum of the package for v6.2.1 and earlier releases, or create a shim for `make-syntax-introducer` that resides in its own package that has different implementations for different releases. To me, tha

Re: [racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

2015-10-25 Thread Philip Blair
Hello all, I was hoping to get some mailing list assistance with this issue involving adding R7RS's `#u8(...)' bytevector syntax to the readtable: The readtable extension culminates with the following: (with-syntax ([(vals ...) (read-syntax src in)]) (syntax (bytevector vals ...)) (Where `b

Re: [racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

2015-10-25 Thread Stephen Chang
This paper is not about Racket but reports on an r7rs implementation experience and so may have some helpful hints: http://www.schemeworkshop.org/2014/papers/Kato2014.pdf On Oct 25, 2015 5:18 PM, "Alexis King" wrote: > I have built a very small, very incomplete implementation of R7RS in > Racket

[racket-users] R7RS (small) in Racket

2015-10-25 Thread Alexis King
I have built a very small, very incomplete implementation of R7RS in Racket. You can install the “r7rs” package, or you can find it on GitHub here: https://github.com/lexi-lambda/racket-r7rs Most of the standard seems fairly straightforward, but there are two questions I have. First of all, do t