[racket-users] Re: Embedded Racket reimplementation for constrained hardware?

2021-06-08 Thread George Neuner
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT), "schle...@gmail.com" wrote: >I think in such an environment I would like to control memory usage myself, >or maybe have a #lang that allows very fine grained and low level control >over resources. (outputting lowerlevel code than racket/base). >If you

[racket-users] Re: Embedded Racket reimplementation for constrained hardware?

2021-06-06 Thread schle...@gmail.com
I think in such an environment I would like to control memory usage myself, or maybe have a #lang that allows very fine grained and low level control over resources. (outputting lowerlevel code than racket/base). If you need persistent data-structures they are nice, but often times you don't

[racket-users] Re: Embedded Racket reimplementation for constrained hardware?

2021-06-05 Thread George Neuner
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT), dbohdan wrote: >Has anyone tried making a small embedded implementation of Racket? I mean >"embedded" not in the sense of 8-bit microcontrollers but more powerful yet >still constrained devices, like routers with 64 MB RAM running Linux or the