Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-29 Thread John Cowan
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 11:33 PM Hendrik Boom wrote: Sounds like there was more than one microEmacs. Interesting. > Sorry, I was actually talking about Freemacs, but I had forgotten its name. John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowanco...@ccil.org We do, doodley do, doodley

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-29 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 07:24:19PM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language > based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl > at . But there were a lot of other >

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-29 Thread John Cowan
MicroEmacs was based on MINT ("MINT Is Not Trac"). TRAC is a language based entirely on macroprocessing, with an implementation written in Perl at . But there were a lot of other differences unrelated to Elisp vs. MINT. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:56 PM

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-29 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:01:27PM +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > Hi james > > * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another > GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these > over another?* > > Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-29 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Hi james * I noticed several people at Racketcon using, not Aquamacs, but another GUI version of Emacs. Is there any particular reason to pick one of these over another?* Maybe spacemacs? (I don’t use spacEmacs so I’m only guessing based on the survey response) S. On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at

Re: [racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-27 Thread James Platt
On Feb 26, 2020, at 10:44 AM, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two or > even three editors. > https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ I am in transition between DrRacket and Emacs so I checked both of those two,

[racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-26 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
At 62 response, sadly the histogram doesn't show how many people use two or even three editors. https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ s. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 2:05 PM Stephen De Gabrielle < spdegabrie...@gmail.com> wrote: > at 18 responses > [image: Three-set Venn diagram (at 18

[racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-24 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
at 18 responses [image: Three-set Venn diagram (at 18 responses).png] I think this is fascinating. (I'm filled with fear and admiration for the lone racketeer in the middle) S. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 1:31 PM Stephen De Gabrielle < spdegabrie...@gmail.com> wrote: > If anyone is interested

[racket-users] Re: quick racket editor survey

2020-02-24 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
If anyone is interested you can view the responses here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-GBD6J7ST7/ s. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to