Re: [racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-08 Thread Tim Brown
Jay, I agree with Greg, too. For me, that involves abandoning my patch, and a whole load of git admin the sum of which effort is greater than you just doing it. So, please do and reject my pull request (if you can). Regards, Tim On 08/05/15 11:20, Jay McCarthy wrote: I agree with Greg, that

Re: [racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-08 Thread Jay McCarthy
Okay. I just pushed something. I did a simple test and made sure the newlines aren't there. Can you check if it works for you in your specific scenario? Jay On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:31 AM, Tim Brown tim.br...@cityc.co.uk wrote: Jay, I agree with Greg, too. For me, that involves abandoning my

Re: [racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-08 Thread Jay McCarthy
I agree with Greg, that seems like the right thing. Tim, do you want to make a pull request or do you want me to just take care of it? Jay On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Greg Hendershott greghendersh...@gmail.com wrote: That sounds good. Although I haven't used it in awhile, I recall needing

Re: [racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-08 Thread Tim Brown
Jay, Thank you. On 08/05/15 11:42, Jay McCarthy wrote: Okay. I just pushed something. I did a simple test and made sure the newlines aren't there. Can you check if it works for you in your specific scenario? That seems to do the trick for me. My web-server challenges my Firefox, which in

[racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-07 Thread Tim Brown
I wonder if base64-encode should rather be patched with a #:last-newline? (Default #t) argument. Tim On 7 May 2015 17:37:18 BST, Tim Brown tim.br...@cityc.co.uk wrote: Folks, I've just tried to use web-server/http-digest-auth, and it seems that make-digest-auth-header generates an invalid

Re: [racket-users] Re: web-server http-digest-auth: nonce has \r\n

2015-05-07 Thread Greg Hendershott
That sounds good. Although I haven't used it in awhile, I recall needing to slice that off more often than keeping it. On May 7, 2015 2:22 PM, Tim Brown t...@timb.net wrote: I wonder if base64-encode should rather be patched with a #:last-newline? (Default #t) argument. Tim On 7 May 2015