Take a look at the PLAI language and define-type. I recommend you elaborate
your syntax into PLAI constructs.
On Apr 13, 2015, at 12:40 PM, Nils Van Geele wrote:
> On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 6:26:38 PM UTC+2, Alexis King wrote:
>> What exactly is the difference here between your define-o
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 6:26:38 PM UTC+2, Alexis King wrote:
> What exactly is the difference here between your define-opcode macro and
> Racket’s define-struct form? For example, simply doing (define-struct A2
> result left right relop) would generate make-A2, A2? A2-result, A2-left, etc.
>
What exactly is the difference here between your define-opcode macro and
Racket’s define-struct form? For example, simply doing (define-struct A2 result
left right relop) would generate make-A2, A2? A2-result, A2-left, etc.
What you describe is certainly possible, but I don’t think it’s currentl
Hey all,
Bit of context: I'm writing a compiler for a course and decided to use Racket.
I'm translating an AST to three address code-like instructions. Because I do
not want to manually write a great deal of boilerplate code for each opcode, I
figured I could use macros.
I have a struct `instr
4 matches
Mail list logo
