Re: [racket-users] lexer-parser approach in Racket [was the list of languages made with racket [Hacker News]]

> On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:29 PM, Aidan Gauland wrote: > > On 2/03/19 3:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:15 AM, Aidan Gauland >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 24/02/19 12:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> 2. The means of implementation in Racket are radically different fr

Re: [racket-users] lexer-parser approach in Racket [was the list of languages made with racket [Hacker News]]

On 2/03/19 3:27 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:15 AM, Aidan Gauland wrote: >> >> On 24/02/19 12:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >>> 2. The means of implementation in Racket are radically different from a >>> lexer-parser approach. >> Wait, does this mean that the Beautiful

Re: [racket-users] lexer-parser approach in Racket [was the list of languages made with racket [Hacker News]]

> On Mar 1, 2019, at 2:15 AM, Aidan Gauland wrote: > > On 24/02/19 12:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> 2. The means of implementation in Racket are radically different from a >> lexer-parser approach. > Wait, does this mean that the Beautiful Racket book is leading me down the > wrong pat

Re: [racket-users] lexer-parser approach in Racket [was the list of languages made with racket [Hacker News]]

On 24/02/19 12:08 PM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > 2. The means of implementation in Racket are radically different from a > lexer-parser approach. Wait, does this mean that the /Beautiful Racket/ book is leading me down the wrong path?  I'm in the middle of the bf chapter