On 2015-05-02 2:29 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
What's the current viability of running Racket on a small OpenWRT
device? (Anything new, such as due to the recent modularization of the
core?)
Nothing that I know of since 2011ish. The smaller core might make it a
little easier to assemble a
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote on 05/03/2015 12:55 PM:
On 2015-05-02 2:29 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
What's the current viability of running Racket on a small OpenWRT
device? (Anything new, such as due to the recent modularization of the
core?)
Nothing that I know of since 2011ish. The smaller core
Tony Garnock-Jones wrote on 05/03/2015 03:10 PM:
On 2015-05-03 2:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
128 RAM and 128 NAND flash, albeit with a different SoC with lower
CPU clock rate. I don't want to rely on USB Storage for this
project.
I should mention also that I couldn't do anything useful with
On 2015-05-03 2:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
128 RAM and 128 NAND flash, albeit with a different SoC with lower
CPU clock rate. I don't want to rely on USB Storage for this
project.
I should mention also that I couldn't do anything useful with Racket 5.x
(as it was at the time) on the
What's the current viability of running Racket on a small OpenWRT
device? (Anything new, such as due to the recent modularization of the
core?)
For example of specs of a popular beefy retail home WiFi router that
runs OpenWRT well:
Processor: Atheros AR7161 rev 2 680MHz (MIPS arch)
5 matches
Mail list logo
