On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Rusi Mody wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 9:46:53 PM UTC+5:30, David K. Storrs
> wrote:
> > I find PP to be a useful tool for thinking about programming, but not
> terribly significant in everyday use -- my code will typically end up as a
> mixture of
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 at 9:46:53 PM UTC+5:30, David K. Storrs wrote:
> I find PP to be a useful tool for thinking about programming, but not
> terribly significant in everyday use -- my code will typically end up as a
> mixture of functional, declarative, procedural, and OO. The fact th
I find PP to be a useful tool for thinking about programming, but not
terribly significant in everyday use -- my code will typically end up as a
mixture of functional, declarative, procedural, and OO. The fact that
Racket makes it easy to mix all of these is one of its many appeals.
On Thu, Feb 1
The world of text books for undergraduate PL classes changed radically in the
1980s with the introduction of Kamin’s book and Friedman & Wand’s EOPL. One of
the final bricks in this wall to fence of “paradigm” teaching is SK’s PLAI.
Instead of paradigms, these books emphasized the idea of inte
I've edited both the paradigms and comparison pages to emphasise and add
criticisms citing the paper.
While I don't consider Wikipedia either a safe or reliable source for
study, it is nevertheless used widely. I would suggest in this context it
is a marketing tool - just take a look at the la
On Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 11:19:06 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Greg Trzeciak wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 10:35:45 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> >> Thanks. I assume you have seen my old web page with Don Q as my image :-)
>
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Greg Trzeciak wrote:
>
> On Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 10:35:45 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> Thanks. I assume you have seen my old web page with Don Q as my image :-)
>
> Believe it or not... I haven't which makes the analogy even more fitting =)
>
>
On Sunday, February 12, 2017 at 10:35:45 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Thanks. I assume you have seen my old web page with Don Q as my image :-)
Believe it or not... I haven't which makes the analogy even more fitting =)
To make sure I didn't simply have it in my subconsciousness I even
> On Feb 12, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Greg Trzeciak wrote:
>
> On Saturday, February 11, 2017 at 3:30:42 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>> Racket should be removed from the list.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/sk-teach-pl-post-linnaean/
>>
>> Programming l
On Saturday, February 11, 2017 at 3:30:42 PM UTC+1, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> Racket should be removed from the list.
>
>
>
> http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/sk-teach-pl-post-linnaean/
>
> Programming language ‘‘paradigms’’ are a moribund and tedious legacy of a
> by
> On Feb 11, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Greg Trzeciak wrote:
>
> I have stumbled upon the following wiki page:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages
>
> Supported paradigms:
> ---
> Language: Racket
> Number of Paradigms: 6
> Conc
Le 11/02/2017 à 14:31, Greg Trzeciak a écrit :
I have stumbled upon the following wiki page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages
Supported paradigms:
---
Language: Racket
Number of Paradigms: 6
...
According to the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
