Nice. Thanks, Tony.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones
wrote:
> On 10/18/2016 12:27 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> > > wrote:
> > I think the
On 10/18/2016 12:27 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
> > wrote:
> I think the `integer->integer-bytes` function is probably what you want.
>
> Thanks Sam, that does the trick.
You might also
David pointed out that I failed to do a reply all when I pointed him to the
packed-binary package on PLaneT that does what he wants. Here is the text
of that post in case anyone else ever needs it.
I have a packed-binary package on PLaneT that we use for for reading binary
data based on a similar
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:39 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
wrote:
> I think the `integer->integer-bytes` function is probably what you want.
>
> Sam
>
>
Thanks Sam, that does the trick.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:38 PM, David Storrs
> wrote:
> > What is
I think the `integer->integer-bytes` function is probably what you want.
Sam
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:38 PM, David Storrs wrote:
> What is the best way to write binary data such that I have control of the
> representation? Basically, I want the Racket equivalent of the
5 matches
Mail list logo