Snapshot-based pkg builds are here: https://plt.eecs.northwestern.edu/pkg-build/
Robby
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:11 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
>
>> On Feb 25, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>
>> Did a fresh checkout solve the problem?
>>
>> If not, can you show more
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 5:36 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> Did a fresh checkout solve the problem?
>
> If not, can you show more context to clarify which packages are being
> built when the crash happens. (That is, the crash is possibly not task
> in "1", which is shown here.) Even better, making
Thanks. That's interesting. So below are the flags `configure --help` offers. I
don't see anything specific to link racket statically. Any hint?
`configure' configures this package to adapt to many kinds of systems.
Usage: ./configure [OPTION]... [VAR=VALUE]...
To assign environment variables
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 1:33 PM, Linh Chi Nguyen
> wrote:
>
> anyway, when being asked to say-something, the machine generates quite good
> sentences. i have this secret hope [0] that if i feed it enough game theory
> literature, somehow it can generate something of value for my phd thesis =))
With the usual PhD advisor, you may not even need an infinite number of monkeys
:(
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 4:33 PM, Linh Chi Nguyen
> wrote:
>
> after i did the exercise as guided, i think there is no need to use
> hash-table.
>
> also, i don't use the provided text input, but i read-words
after i did the exercise as guided, i think there is no need to use hash-table.
also, i don't use the provided text input, but i read-words from text files. so
i have to add some trick to create the beginning " " and the end "." for the
writing-style.
in the function (add-to-ws ws word1 word2),
Thanks, Ben.
Of course you are right. I was somehow fixated and had lost the context.
Sorry for the noise.
> On Feb 25, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Ben Greenman wrote:
>
> The printed explanation is giving the meaning of the whole line (in the
> context of the call to member) --- not just the meaning o
The printed explanation is giving the meaning of the whole line (in the
context of the call to member) --- not just the meaning of the application
(null? lat)
Hope this helps
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Kieron Hardy
wrote:
> I'm going through The Little Schemer (Fourth Edition). On page
I'm going through The Little Schemer (Fourth Edition). On page 23 the first
question posed asks:
What is the meaning of the line
((null? lat) #f)
where
lat is (mashed potatoes and meat gravy)
The printed explanation seems to be a misprint as it appears to be the answer
to a different question
oh it's very kind of you.
thank you,
let's see
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit
Did a fresh checkout solve the problem?
If not, can you show more context to clarify which packages are being
built when the crash happens. (That is, the crash is possibly not task
in "1", which is shown here.) Even better, making with `CPUS=1` would
clearly identify the package where the compiler
On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 11:50:30 AM UTC+1, Linh Chi Nguyen wrote:
> Wow, it's really a good curriculum.
> Just have to drop in to say something, im not doing this exercise for some
> course, there is no teacher.
>
>
> I was just massively sad and when i got up i need to do something th
12 matches
Mail list logo