I looked at the code for a while again and think I now begin to understand it a
bit more:
I did not know `(let/ec` so I had to read about it. It says, that it is
equivalent to `(call/ec proc` or something, which is equivalent to
`(call-with-escape-continuation ...`. Uff … I don't know much
I have been working on it, but at very beginning stage and no working code
right now.
The official website of Graphviz provides lots of papers on the underlying
algorithms,
I also found *Handbook of Graph Drawing and Visualization *is worth reading.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Andrew
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:28:49 -0400, George Neuner
wrote:
>When you say, (let/ec foo ... ) , all that's happening is the compiler
>defines a pseudo-function named 'foo' that when called will exit from
>the block of code in the scope of the let. (call/cc foo ...) does the
May I recommend The Seasoned Schemer?
> On Aug 19, 2017, at 9:28 AM, George Neuner wrote:
>
>
> On 8/19/2017 6:16 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>> I looked at the code for a while again and think I now begin to understand
>> it a bit more:
>>
>> I did not know
On 8/19/2017 6:16 AM, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
I looked at the code for a while again and think I now begin to understand it a
bit more:
I did not know `(let/ec` so I had to read about it. It says, that it is equivalent to
`(call/ec proc` or something, which is equivalent to
On Saturday, August 19, 2017 at 12:16:53 PM UTC+2, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote:
>
> Is there some easy to understand introduction to continuations in Racket?
> (not a super clever and scientific Friedman paper, which I'd probably need 1
> year to actually understand :D)
Try with Beautiful Racket
2017-08-18 12:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gwozdziewycz :
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
> diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the question of "which
> annoying tool should I use?" Graphviz has limitations for the type of
>
On Sat, 19 Aug 2017 10:36:37 -0400, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>May I recommend The Seasoned Schemer?
>
You may certainly. Ironically, that is one book on Scheme that I have
never read.
My point to Zelphir was that continuations per se are not unique to
Scheme ...
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 6:21 AM, WarGrey Gyoudmon Ju
wrote:
> I have been working on it, but at very beginning stage and no working code
> right now.
Are you focused more on replacing Graphviz, or a generalized drawing
and visualization library that could be used to more
There are a few tree layout algorithms implemented in
pict/tree-layout: http://docs.racket-lang.org/pict/Tree_Layout.html
Robby
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Daniel Prager
wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I did commercial work on mind-map like tools in the 2000's, and have
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz
wrote:
> Are you focused more on replacing Graphviz, or a generalized drawing
> and visualization library that could be used to more easily put
> together a Graphviz like tool? I guess they are likely somewhat
> similar
Hi Andrew
I did commercial work on mind-map like tools in the 2000's, and have a soft
spot for graph and tree visualisation.
Example: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/221249211_fig1_Fig-1-
Example-hi-tree-laid-out-in-the-standard-layout-style-It-shows-the-logical
I didn't work on the deep
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard
wrote:
> 2017-08-18 12:10 GMT+02:00 Andrew Gwozdziewycz :
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I've been using graphviz for years for basic network architecture
>> diagrams and things, mostly to avoid answering the
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 7:10 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> It sounds like an interesting and useful project. What would you want this
> solution to do, exactly?
The last public hack job I did using graphviz is something like this:
14 matches
Mail list logo