Well, there's no imediate return, i need to type exit 0 to finally the test
works
I am using read-line to read input. Today later I will post more code(of
refine-main).
Thanks
Em dom, 17 de fev de 2019 10:37, Greg Hendershott What does it do? Does `check-equal?` show a failure message? If so,
What does it do? Does `check-equal?` show a failure message? If so,
what does it say?
I don't know what `refine-main` does, but this simple version works for me:
#lang racket
(require rackunit)
(define (refine-main)
(display (read-line))) ;echo
(check-equal?
(with-output-to-string
I've written and use a `find-executable-path*` inspired by Emacs'
`exec-path-from-shell` (which I'm pretty sure I learned about from Greg on
this list) that gives the same API as `find-executable-path`, but with a
special case for Mac OS:
WOW. I finish read the doc about #:final
That is so beatiful thing. Thank you to you three
Em dom, 17 de fev de 2019 às 22:18, Joao Pedro Abreu De Souza <
jp_ab...@id.uff.br> escreveu:
> Thanks for the feedback!
> I will study this code and make more functional
>
> Em dom, 17 de fev de 2019
I went ahead and added some info on the difference between Racket and
Python appends to https://github.com/racket/racket/wiki/Python-to-Racket .
Sorry to whoever for the salvo of poorly documented revisions.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 12:21 AM David Van Horn wrote:
> I've updated the docs to get
Thanks a lot.
Sorry about the simple error.
Em dom, 17 de fev de 2019 22:06, Matthias Felleisen
>
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 6:44 PM, Joao Pedro Abreu De Souza
> wrote:
>
> (check-equal?
> (with-output-to-string
>(lambda ()
> (with-input-from-string "input"
>(lambda ()
>
Well, if you call `(exit 0)`, your Racket program really will exit with
code 0 without doing anything else: the function `exit` never returns, so,
in your case, `execute` never returns, `refine-main` never returns, and
Rackunit never gets a chance to look at any output it may or may not have
(define (refine-main)
(display next-string) ;;feito
(set! next-command (shell-parser (my-read-line))) ;;TODO my-read-line
(execute next-command) ;;TODO execute
(refine-main)) ;;feito
This is refine-main
"shell-parser" is just a PEG-based parser, that return a
> On Feb 17, 2019, at 6:44 PM, Joao Pedro Abreu De Souza
> wrote:
>
> (check-equal?
> (with-output-to-string
>(lambda ()
> (with-input-from-string "input"
>(lambda ()
> (refine-main)
Your mistake is in the above line. You want to write refine-main not
Thanks for the feedback!
I will study this code and make more functional
Em dom, 17 de fev de 2019 22:13, Philip McGrath Well, if you call `(exit 0)`, your Racket program really will exit with
> code 0 without doing anything else: the function `exit` never returns, so,
> in your case, `execute`
I tried to bump the pinned Racket version in racket2nix from 7.1 to
7.2, and I ran into issues:
raco setup: 3 making: /nix
open-output-file: cannot open output file
path:
The "fediverse" means the federated (decentralized) social web.
And Spritely, as I've said here recently, is a series of demos
and writeups which show how to "level up" the fediverse with
some new ideas to make it more powerful and resilient.
I just finished writing the documentation for Spritely
On Feb 14, 2019, at 9:22 PM, Alex Harsanyi wrote:
> There are two solutions I can think of:
>
> (1) derive combo-field% and override the on-popup method to construct the
> choice menu dynamically based on what is selected in the combo box field.
> This has a few disadvantages, namely (a) you
13 matches
Mail list logo
