[racket-users] Could someone check on the package server

2019-10-04 Thread gfb
Indexing of updated packages is broken. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on

Re: [racket-users] Current state of racket2 planning?

2019-10-04 Thread David Storrs
Great, thanks! And yes, I missed it for that reason. On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 8:44 AM Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Matthew wrote a long email on Wednesday with about the current state, > although the subject was "Rhombus Project Plan" so that may have been why > you missed it. > > Sam > > On Fri,

Re: [racket-users] Fwd: Re: Racket code query

2019-10-04 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Connie said what i learnt from the helpful responses is about the paramatize function. > i didnt think of using it or know about but now i do :) i also didn't think > of using read-eval-print-loop! And I hadn't seen/heard of it before, so > thank you for helping it was very useful. I fixed my

Re: [racket-users] Current state of racket2 planning?

2019-10-04 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
Matthew wrote a long email on Wednesday with about the current state, although the subject was "Rhombus Project Plan" so that may have been why you missed it. Sam On Fri, Oct 4, 2019, 8:42 AM David Storrs wrote: > The racket2 discussion dropped off my radar a while ago but I got some > spoons

[racket-users] Current state of racket2 planning?

2019-10-04 Thread David Storrs
The racket2 discussion dropped off my radar a while ago but I got some spoons back and thought I'd check in again. Where should I look to see the ongoing discussion / current state? Sidebar: I read the Honu paper... Is the current plan still "programmer writes C-ish code and then, behind the

Re: [racket-users] Fwd: Re: Racket code query

2019-10-04 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Thanks All, I've passed on your responses. I'll let you know if I get any feedback. Stephen On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:25 AM Ben Greenman wrote: > I opened a pull request with a suggestion > https://github.com/conniepocky/Waffle-Lang/pull/1 > > On 10/3/19, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > Hi >

[racket-users] Does Racket have something similar to IPython.embed() for debugging?

2019-10-04 Thread Marc Kaufmann
Hi, a friend who uses Python mentioned that how he debugs is via `embed()`, which launches an IPython console at the point it is called with all the variables that exist at that point being defined, so you can inspect a bunch without sprinkling prints everywhere. ```{python} from IPython