Great news!
Worth a blog post to follow up on:
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2013/03/200_25.html
http://blog.racket-lang.org/2014/11/800.html
/Jens Axel
2015-04-29 1:38 GMT+02:00 Tim Brown :
> Folks,
>
> I've just done a quick burst of cherry picking tasks on Rosetta
> Code (www.rosett
Oh dear!
That didn't last long. It seems, that Racket now has 846 tasks.
It is now no longer the /joint/ most popular programming language
on Rosetta Code.
Tim
On Wednesday, 29 April 2015 00:38:53 UTC+1, Tim Brown wrote:
> I do believe that Tcl and Racket are now jointly the
> most popular prog
Folks,
I've just done a quick burst of cherry picking tasks on Rosetta
Code (www.rosettacode.org). I took a quick look at:
* http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Tcl
and
* http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Racket
And they both have the line:
"The following 845 pages are in this category, out
US Congressional Hearing of
Saudi billionaire" maan Al Sanea "
and Money Laundering
with bank of America
With Arabic Subtitles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIBNnQvhU8s
*موقع اليوتيوب الذي عرض فيديوهات جلسة استماع الكونجرس الأمريكي *
* لمتابعة نشاطات غسل الأموال ونشاطات*
*ا
US Congressional Hearing of
Saudi billionaire" maan Al Sanea "
and Money Laundering
with bank of America
With Arabic Subtitles
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIBNnQvhU8s
*موقع اليوتيوب الذي عرض فيديوهات جلسة استماع الكونجرس الأمريكي *
* لمتابعة نشاطات غسل الأموال ونشاطات*
*ا
Yeah, maybe some misconfigured spam filter is the culprit. Anyway, the
bug is fixed now :)
On 04/28/2015 11:13 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Strangely, Matthew's email to this bug got through fine, and your email
successfully went to the bug-notification email list, but not to the
tracker. I w
Strangely, Matthew's email to this bug got through fine, and your email
successfully went to the bug-notification email list, but not to the
tracker. I wonder if there's a filter somewhere for that account that
caught this.
Sam
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 3:16 PM Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado <
i.
Ah, of course, that makes sense.
Thanks for the suggestion how to explore this using with-continuation-mark.
I just submitted a pull request updating the exn:break-continuation
documentation with a note/tip.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket
I think that the issue is that with-handlers calls it's handlers with
the continuation of the with-handlers expression itself, but
uncaught-exception-handler calls it's handlers with the continuation
at the point of the break. So in the with-handlers case, you have
already escaped out of the contex
Tim Brown wrote on 04/28/2015 09:16 AM:
Jay proved to me that the web-server was working with an experiment
involving Apache Bench (ab); which is a nifty tool, I must say!
I also like JMeter for this purpose, since JMeter can validate output,
for performance stress-testing. Though JMeter is m
#lang racket/base
;;; Note: Run the following from command-line Racket (not DrRacket or
;;; racket-mode).
;;; [0] Something that runs long enough to give you a chance to break
(define (long-loop)
(displayln "Starting loop. Press CONTROL+C...")
(for/sum ([i (in-range 10)])
1))
;;;
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
> David,
>
> Jay proved to me that the web-server was working with an experiment
> involving Apache Bench (ab); which is a nifty tool, I must say!
>
> I'm still no wiser as to why the browser serialises GETs to a single
> server.
HTTP/1.1
> Hypot
FLOPS 2016: 13th International Symposium on Functional and Logic Programming
March 3-6, 2016, Kochi, Japan
Call For Papers http://www.info.kochi-tech.ac.jp/FLOPS2016/
Writing down detailed computational steps is not the only way of
programming. The alternative, being used increasingly
David,
Jay proved to me that the web-server was working with an experiment
involving Apache Bench (ab); which is a nifty tool, I must say!
I'm still no wiser as to why the browser serialises GETs to a single
server. Hypothetically, if I wanted to AJAX the replies from my script
into two divs -- I
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:38:54PM +0100, Tim Brown wrote:
> Tinkering with network.pipelining settings has done me no good... so
> going off-topic slightly -- how do I use Firefox to test web server
> concurrency? [Choose to answer this or not, I'm about to JFGI]
Rather than expect a single brows
Jay,
On 28/04/15 11:53, Jay McCarthy wrote:
I ran an experiment to test your servlet. The results are at this gist:
Thanks for that experiment.
I have reproduced your results.
So... Racket /is/ serving concurrent requests.
There is a bare possibility that it is working on OS X/my machine an
16 matches
Mail list logo
