This is not a direct answer, but has a few different answer-like things.
The Racket contract system has a similar problem to solve. Suppose
contracted procedure is supposed to return a number? value. The state
would look like this:
( continuation (obey-or-error number? ( function
Robby, I think what I want is simple to say:
If I have a Racket program and manually CPS-transform and then defunctionalize
it, I would be able to compare and analyze continuations (and normal
procedures, for that matter).
I want to be able to do the same without CPS-transforming and
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 9:54:23 PM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 12:54:10 PM UTC+1, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Sean Kemplay sean.kemp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All,
Sending an http request through our corporate proxy
On 13/08/15 22:55, Aidan Gauland wrote:
Are there any non-graphical FrTime demos? I'm trying to figure out how
to define your own behaviors, and just going by the manual
http://docs.racket-lang.org/frtime/, it seems rather imperative in
nature, which is not what I understood it to be from
Thanks Eli.
On 13/08/15 18:30, Eli Barzilay wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:35 AM, Tim Brown tim.br...@cityc.co.uk wrote:
Folks,
The “PLT Scheme” website, as was, had a set of preview pictures along
the left hand side which scrolled in a “fish-eyed” kind of way (you
either know what I’m
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 10:22:03 AM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 9:54:23 PM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 12:54:10 PM UTC+1, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Sean Kemplay sean.kemp...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015 07:29:37 -0500,
Robby Findler wrote:
For that you would have to write a (straightforward) compiler that
transformed a fully expanded Racket program into another program (in
that same language), inserting with-continuation-mark expressions
around every subexpression. Run
(1) how grey is your cat?
The color of a television, tuned to a dead channel.
Robby
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
On 08/14/2015 11:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
The color of a television, tuned to a dead channel.
Bright, pure, sky blue? What an unusual grey.
https://twitter.com/DJSundog/status/629659761902948352
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Racket Users
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 3:41:04 PM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 10:22:03 AM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 9:54:23 PM UTC+1, Sean Kemplay wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 12:54:10 PM UTC+1, Jay McCarthy wrote:
On Tue,
Dear all,
As everybody knows, Racket's plot library is feature-rich and produces
beautiful output. The draw library is also great for generating
diagrams. I prefer functional-style drawing over LaTeX packages.
What I would like to do is to be able to use these libraries in
Maxima, Julia and
Is there any way in Racket to use (delimited) continuations to find out whether
I'm evaluating an expression in the same evaluation context as before?
Let's assume for a second that Racket had an ordinary call stack, and I could
access that call stack as a first-order value. Then I could
Hi Klaus,
For what it’s worth, AspectScheme, which needs the call stack to express
control flow related pointcuts, redefines the #%app macro to reify the parts of
the call stack that you need using continuation marks.
I doubt there is a way other than that one to reify the call stack, but if
For that you would have to write a (straightforward) compiler that
transformed a fully expanded Racket program into another program (in
that same language), inserting with-continuation-mark expressions
around every subexpression. Run the transformed program. Then, at the
point that you wish to
14 matches
Mail list logo
