Re: [racket-users] Speed of scribble.

When you run 'raco setup' you are rebuilding the entire manual. In general, this can take arbitrarily long because it involves running example fragments of code for their output, but even if you're not doing that, I expect Scribble will take longer than regexp-munging a txt file to get html (not

[racket-users] Speed of scribble.

I meant, of course, speed of scribble. On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 09:41:26PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I'm thinking of converting some of my writing > > from an ad-hoc file format I invented ten or twenty yearas ago because > I needed something that would cooperate with revision control and >

[racket-users] peed of scribble.

I'm thinking of converting some of my writing from an ad-hoc file format I invented ten or twenty yearas ago because I needed something that would cooperate with revision control and prevailing word-processors just wouldn't do that to Scribble. and I'd like some performance estimates so that

Re: [racket-users] FFI | Unions

On Friday, 1 April 2016 00:11:30 UTC+2, Matthew Flatt wrote: > At Thu, 31 Mar 2016 15:00:35 -0700 (PDT), Pedro Caldeira wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I am trying to use a set of bindings to SDL2 and I am at loss on how to use > > C > > unions. > > > > If I understood correctly both

[racket-users] Racket internal error when trying to create an executable

After you make the changes, run "raco setup" from the command line and just wait. Everything should be good after that. (No need to delete anything.) Robby On Saturday, April 2, 2016, Alex Harsanyi > wrote: > Hi

Re: [racket-users] Racket internal error when trying to create an executable

Hi Matthew, Thanks for the quick reply. I will try a snapshot build of Racket in a few days. Unfortunately, if I just make the changes you suggested in Racket 6.4 and remove the corresponding .zo and .dep files, I just get linkage errors when I start Racket. However, this is due to my

Re: [racket-users] r6rs use

I am no R6RS expert (so I might have missed something), but I believe there are two issues: - there is no repl specified in r6rs (only top level programs) (implementation can of course provide a repl, but they don't have to) - the function sort is supposed to be unbound

[racket-users] r6rs use

Hi, i have a code that works well in #lang racket and also with other scheme compilers with minor changes,Bigloo,MIT scheme, but it does not work with #!r6rs i do not know why,here it is (some extract): #!r6rs (import (rnrs)) ... ;; sort operands in a logic expression ;;